|
Re: [FRC Designs] Announcing a New Partnership with GameSense!
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrennanB
Not exactly sure how/why you think everything needs to be paired with CD,
|
If you have to ask, the answer isn't likely to impress you.
How many one true temples of FIRST ___ robotics knowledge do we need?
Your "one jumbled mess" is exactly what the proliferation of overlapping sites, each claiming to be the best repository of ___, creates.
I never said they all had to be part of CD. I did write that I think the people who get the urge to add something useful (I'll bet CD existed first), should start by collaborating with the infrastructure that already exists. My hunch is that the collaboration (if it was more than just lip service, and if both/all parties actually collaborate) would create a better and more easily navigated total.
Of course I might be wrong. Cooperation might be a bad thing, and other approaches might be the way to go.
Blake
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases  I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
Last edited by gblake : 27-06-2015 at 13:42.
|
You don't have to build a winning robot to build a team, but you won't build a great team unless they are striving to build a winning robot. - Richard Wallace [more] 
27-06-2015, 12:58
Threaded Mode