|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
The tire seems to be tube and not a strip. Same polyurethane tube a handful of teams used this year.
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
Quote:
![]() |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
The polyurethane material is definitely the way to go. We tested pretty much everything out there and that was the most durable, highest traction materiel we could find for manipulating both totes and rcs. The trick is keeping them clean. Wiping them down in between in match does the trick. The best thing about it is that you can get for any much any size intake roller you need maxing out at 4 inches. We just stretched it over a 4 inch andymark performance wheel because that's what we had laying around at the shop. It required no adhesives just relied on the friction between the materiel and the hub to hold it and it worked great. The only thing we did was machine it down drastically to save weight. 179 Used them as well at IRI and they 3d printed plastic hubs for them. Originally they tried to make them out of abs but the hubs where not holding up do to the loads and impacts however after they switched to pla they held up great. Maybe someone from 179 can provide a little more incite on printing methods ie infill, wall thickness,and print direction.
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
The ingenuity and different thinking shown in this thread is inspiring, and will make my life easier during build season.
I always find these kind of threads extremely useful! Keep the ideas rolling. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
Quote:
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
Yeah, our intakes were the weakest part of our robot during the season so they really need a redesign. Thanks for all the ideas you all proposed! I have no one from my team to consult right now, but I feel convinced about the polyurethane method.
|
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
Just throwing this question out there - since I have no experience with these at all...but how would Colson wheels compare? It seems a much more affordable option than the expensive polyurethane material from McM.
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
I would imagine Colson wheels have a significantly lower CoF on a tote or can than a softer polyurethane compound.
|
|
#26
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
Quote:
All said and done a mcmaster based polyurethane custom wheel is about 2-3 times the cots of a banebots wheel, but will last far far longer and performs great deal better. The relatively thick tread has some give/compression which helps as well. Colsons are slightly cheaper, would last presumably as long, but not perform nearly as well (they're really a different kind of tread with different design constraints). |
|
#27
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
Quote:
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
Quote:
|
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
Would anyone happen to know how much larger/smaller you want the tubing to be compared to whatever you slide them onto? From what I've heard, you want something slightly smaller than the diameter of what you're going to slide onto, and you need to inflate it slightly so it slides onto it.
|
|
#30
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: In Need of Banebot Wheels
We did not use the adhesive backed versions; we riveted the material on instead.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|