Go to Post If you want to change the culture sometimes you need to change a little yourself - Koko Ed [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: See post #1 for questions
1A & 2A 37 13.21%
1A & 2B 52 18.57%
1B & 2A 44 15.71%
1B & 2B 147 52.50%
Voters: 280. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #46   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 12:09
Brian Maher's Avatar
Brian Maher Brian Maher is offline
Questionable Decisionmakers
FRC #2791 (Shaker Robotics), FRC #1257 (Parallel Universe)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Troy, NY; NJ
Posts: 475
Brian Maher has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Maher has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Maher has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Maher has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Maher has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Maher has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Maher has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Maher has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Maher has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Maher has a reputation beyond reputeBrian Maher has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared Russell View Post
Winning feels good and can often bootstrap future success, so in both cases I'd personally choose "winning".

But from the outside looking in, if you were to ask me which is a "more impressive" accomplishment, I'd probably go with the #4 seed in both cases. I have seen many #1 seeded alliances where the last robot makes significant contributions; I have seen relatively few #1 seeded alliances where the last robot would not have been replaceable without a loss in effectiveness by one or more of the other 21 robots that had picked or been picked before it.

For this reason, I am a BIG fan of a district points system. Winning the tournament as a third robot is worth something, sure...but consistently seeding high is worth just as much or more. If a #4 seed was worth more qualifying points than a last pick blue banner, then I would change my answer to the original question (at the Regional/District level).
This is one of the many benefits of the District system. At the 2014 Clifton District Event, Team 1257 was picked in the second round by the #2 alliance and we won the event. We never felt like we didn't deserve a blue banner because we had a really cohesive alliance.
The win was an inspiration. We had a taste of success and wanted more. We made extensive improvements to our robot and pushed to earn enough District Points to qualify for MAR Championship. While we didn't get picked at our second district, we ended up as the #2 Alliance Captain at MAR Champs. We lost in quarters to the winning alliance, but the success we found in 2014 motivated us to improve our team as much as possible for 2015.
In order to reproduce our success, we put a lot of effort into increasing our resources, improving our design and fabrication process, and improving our business program. This season was our first season ever that we were picked at both our District Events (the #7 alliance captain at Mount Olive, and the second pick of the Finalist #2 alliance at North Brunswick). This year was our best yet, and it was largely inspired by that win at Clifton.
TL;DR We've found that success breeds success, and that can begin with an event win as a late pick.
__________________
2016-present, Mentor, FRC 2791 - Shaker Robotics
2016: Tech Valley SF (5236, 2791, 3624) and Quality, Finger Lakes SF (5254, 2791, 2383), Battlecry@WPI Winner (195, 2791, 501), Robot Rumble Winner (2791, 195, 6463)

2016-present, Mentor, FRC 1257 - Parallel Universe
2016: Mount Olive Winner (1257, 5624, 1676), Bridgewater-Raritan Finalist (1257, 25, 3340, 555) and GP, MAR CMP Winner (225, 341, 1257), Archimedes SF (4003, 4564, 5842, 1257), IRI Invite

2012-2015, Student, FRC 1257 - Parallel Universe
2015: Mount Olive QF (1257, 1811, 1923) and Safety Award, North Brunswick Finalist (11, 193, 1257) and Team Spirit and Safety Awards
2014: Clifton Winner (1626, 869, 1257), MAR CMP QF (1257, 293, 303)
2013: TCNJ Safety Award
2012: Mount Olive QF (204, 303, 1257)
Reply With Quote
  #47   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 13:10
Chris is me's Avatar
Chris is me Chris is me is offline
no bag, vex only, final destination
AKA: Pinecone
FRC #0228 (GUS Robotics); FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 7,718
Chris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond reputeChris is me has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Chris is me
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay O'Donnell View Post
Given I don't know which team you are talking about, I can see this person's opinion making sense if they didn't play a huge role in the alliances success.
I can understand your point at the regional level, but I would wager that there has never been a World Champion alliance where the second pick did not play a crucial role in the success of the alliance. If an alliance captain dismisses the importance of the second pick at the championship level, they might as well forefeit their chance at winning the world championship.

Some examples:
2015: 1671 was a competitive scoring robot that could human load without a tethered ramp and place multiple capped stacks of six.
2014: 2848's kiss passing, defense, and occasional long truss shots helped seal the deal for the 254 alliance.
2013: 610 was one of the most consistent cyclers in the world.
2012: 16's ball starvation and feeding strategy was crucial to the success of the alliance.
2011: 973 had the fastest minibot in the world and one of the highest traction drive trains at the event, with strong driving.
2010: 177's ability to pass balls forward, occasionally score from midfield, and consistently hang were part of what gave the alliance the edge in the final matches.
2009: 971 was a very strong scorer with the ability to human load fairly easily as well.
2008: 148's maneuverability and strategic defense meant that they could often prevent opponents from acquiring game pieces or scoring for long periods of time. Check out some of the later matches on Einstein to see how this worked.

I could go on, but I think you get the point.
__________________
Mentor / Drive Coach: 228 (2016-?)
...2016 Waterbury SFs (with 3314, 3719), RIDE #2 Seed / Winners (with 1058, 6153), Carver QFs (with 503, 359, 4607)
Mentor / Consultant Person: 2170 (2017-?)
---
College Mentor: 2791 (2010-2015)
...2015 TVR Motorola Quality, FLR GM Industrial Design
...2014 FLR Motorola Quality / SFs (with 341, 4930)
...2013 BAE Motorola Quality, WPI Regional #1 Seed / Delphi Excellence in Engineering / Finalists (with 20, 3182)
...2012 BAE Imagery / Finalists (with 1519, 885), CT Xerox Creativity / SFs (with 2168, 118)
Student: 1714 (2009) - 2009 Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Regional Winners (with 2826, 2470)
2791 Build Season Photo Gallery - Look here for mechanism photos My Robotics Blog (Updated April 11 2014)
Reply With Quote
  #48   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 13:46
Kevin Leonard Kevin Leonard is offline
Professional Stat Padder
FRC #5254 (HYPE), FRC #20 (The Rocketeers)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 1,253
Kevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Leonard has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
I can understand your point at the regional level, but I would wager that there has never been a World Champion alliance where the second pick did not play a crucial role in the success of the alliance. If an alliance captain dismisses the importance of the second pick at the championship level, they might as well forefeit their chance at winning the world championship.

Some examples:
2015: 1671 was a competitive scoring robot that could human load without a tethered ramp and place multiple capped stacks of six.
2014: 2848's kiss passing, defense, and occasional long truss shots helped seal the deal for the 254 alliance.
2013: 610 was one of the most consistent cyclers in the world.
2012: 16's ball starvation and feeding strategy was crucial to the success of the alliance.
2011: 973 had the fastest minibot in the world and one of the highest traction drive trains at the event, with strong driving.
2010: 177's ability to pass balls forward, occasionally score from midfield, and consistently hang were part of what gave the alliance the edge in the final matches.
2009: 971 was a very strong scorer with the ability to human load fairly easily as well.
2008: 148's maneuverability and strategic defense meant that they could often prevent opponents from acquiring game pieces or scoring for long periods of time. Check out some of the later matches on Einstein to see how this worked.

I could go on, but I think you get the point.
Agreed. I think MAYBE two of those alliances could have won with a different robot for their third partner.

He might also be talking about members of 74 or 5012, who also fall into the "not a captain/first pick" category.
These two had different, less tangible contributions to their alliances than the picks you listed above, so I could understand that kind of feeling.

There are students on 20 that don't feel like we "deserved" our divisional win this year even though I can point to examples where we contributed off-the-field to help with the win. It's a difficult mindset for some people to buy into.
__________________
All of my posts are my opinion only and do not reflect the views of my associated teams.
College Student Mentor on Team 5254, HYPE - Helping Youth Pursue Excellence
(2015-Present)
Alumni of Team 20, The Rocketeers (2011-2014)
I'm attempting a robotics blog. Check it out at RocketHypeRobotics.wordpress.com Updated 10/26/16
Reply With Quote
  #49   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 13:50
Jay O'Donnell's Avatar
Jay O'Donnell Jay O'Donnell is online now
Division by Pirates
FRC #0229 (Division by Zero)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Potsdam, NY/Londonderry, NH
Posts: 1,345
Jay O'Donnell has a reputation beyond reputeJay O'Donnell has a reputation beyond reputeJay O'Donnell has a reputation beyond reputeJay O'Donnell has a reputation beyond reputeJay O'Donnell has a reputation beyond reputeJay O'Donnell has a reputation beyond reputeJay O'Donnell has a reputation beyond reputeJay O'Donnell has a reputation beyond reputeJay O'Donnell has a reputation beyond reputeJay O'Donnell has a reputation beyond reputeJay O'Donnell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
I can understand your point at the regional level, but I would wager that there has never been a World Champion alliance where the second pick did not play a crucial role in the success of the alliance. If an alliance captain dismisses the importance of the second pick at the championship level, they might as well forefeit their chance at winning the world championship.

Some examples:
2015: 1671 was a competitive scoring robot that could human load without a tethered ramp and place multiple capped stacks of six.
2014: 2848's kiss passing, defense, and occasional long truss shots helped seal the deal for the 254 alliance.
2013: 610 was one of the most consistent cyclers in the world.
2012: 16's ball starvation and feeding strategy was crucial to the success of the alliance.
2011: 973 had the fastest minibot in the world and one of the highest traction drive trains at the event, with strong driving.
2010: 177's ability to pass balls forward, occasionally score from midfield, and consistently hang were part of what gave the alliance the edge in the final matches.
2009: 971 was a very strong scorer with the ability to human load fairly easily as well.
2008: 148's maneuverability and strategic defense meant that they could often prevent opponents from acquiring game pieces or scoring for long periods of time. Check out some of the later matches on Einstein to see how this worked.

I could go on, but I think you get the point.
I think the point I was trying to make wasn't what came across in my post so I'll try again. My point was that a team that gets picked in the second round and plays an important role may not have been happy about it because they saw themselves as a premiere bot of an alliance, not the third robot/role player. I fully understand how important these third robots are, but maybe they were expecting more out of themselves.
__________________
Student on Team 1058 (2012-2015)
Mentor on Team 229 (2016-Present)
Writer for Blue Alliance Blog
Reply With Quote
  #50   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 14:08
Taylor's Avatar
Taylor Taylor is offline
Professor of Thinkology, ThD
AKA: @taylorstem
FRC #3487 (Red Pride Robotics)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA 46227
Posts: 4,599
Taylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billfred
You know what they call the graduate with the lowest GPA in med school? Doctor.

You know what they call the fourth robot in the alliance that wins Einstein? Champion.
I'd like to win.
__________________
Hi!
Reply With Quote
  #51   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 14:18
Wayne TenBrink's Avatar
Wayne TenBrink Wayne TenBrink is offline
<< (2008 Game Piece)
FRC #1918 (NC Gears)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Fremont, MI, USA
Posts: 527
Wayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond reputeWayne TenBrink has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

I think it depends on your perspective.

We never played on Saturday afternoon during our first 3 seasons, and I would have given anything just to be in the position to select 1A or 1B. Now that we have won blue banners at districts & district champs, I would always choose 1A. I would consider 1B a step backward.

We have qualified for CMP and made it into playoffs every year since 2009, but never won our division (let alone Einstein!). Therefore, I would have to go with 2B for now. If we ever do win there, I expect that I would choose 2A from that point forward.
__________________
NC Gears (Newaygo County Geeks Engineering Awesome Robotic Solutions)

FRC 1918 (Competing at St. Joseph and West MI in 2017)
FTC 6043 & 7911
Reply With Quote
  #52   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 14:42
Monochron's Avatar
Monochron Monochron is online now
Engineering Mentor
AKA: Brian O'Sullivan
FRC #4561 (TerrorBytes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Research Triangle Park, NC
Posts: 910
Monochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin Leonard View Post
He might also be talking about members of 74 or 5012, who also fall into the "not a captain/first pick" category.
These two had different, less tangible contributions to their alliances than the picks you listed above, so I could understand that kind of feeling.
An interesting thing to consider would be 900 this year. They were a huge part of one of the coolest things developed in the 2015 season, but unfortunately they didn't get to play on the field. Nor did they have the chance to play with the robot that they originally designed for the game. Still they were picked for their talents and their unique position. I know a lot of that has been covered in previous threads, but Chris's defense of non-picking robots reminded me.
Reply With Quote
  #53   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 14:58
marshall's Avatar
marshall marshall is offline
My pants are louder than yours.
FRC #0900 (The Zebracorns)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,322
marshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monochron View Post
An interesting thing to consider would be 900 this year. They were a huge part of one of the coolest things developed in the 2015 season, but unfortunately they didn't get to play on the field. Nor did they have the chance to play with the robot that they originally designed for the game. Still they were picked for their talents and their unique position. I know a lot of that has been covered in previous threads, but Chris's defense of non-picking robots reminded me.
Ohh, we definitely played with our original robot. It got us to CMP, our alliance partners from NC seemed pretty happy with it too (and it's overly-complicated miserable arm! Curse you physics!). Nvidia even liked it.

I appreciate Karthik's question here. It's a good one to ask. I can't help but think he is either scouting with it or trolling us all though... I can't relay the conversation in its entirety because its all a bit fuzzy now but at one point he stopped and asked us if we were serious about taking a robot built in a day to Einstein. I think he was actually asking us if we really were as nuts as we seemed before we started seriously building it. The three folks from 900 involved in that conversation all said "yes" at the same time. I now know that one of the things to look for in an alliance partner has nothing to do with their strategy or their robot but rather their determination and drive to win.
__________________
"La mejor salsa del mundo es la hambre" - Miguel de Cervantes
"The future is unwritten" - Joe Strummer
"Simplify, then add lightness" - Colin Chapman
Reply With Quote
  #54   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 15:28
Monochron's Avatar
Monochron Monochron is online now
Engineering Mentor
AKA: Brian O'Sullivan
FRC #4561 (TerrorBytes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Research Triangle Park, NC
Posts: 910
Monochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

Quote:
Originally Posted by marshall View Post
Ohh, we definitely played with our original robot. It got us to CMP, our alliance partners from NC seemed pretty happy with it too (and it's overly-complicated miserable arm! Curse you physics!). Nvidia even liked it.
I just meant after Qualification rounds at CMP. I'm no detractor of your guys' awesomeness this season. Just figured it was relevant to Chris's comment.
Reply With Quote
  #55   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 15:44
Unsung FIRST Hero
Karthik Karthik is offline
VEX Robotics GDC Chairman
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,346
Karthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond reputeKarthik has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

Quote:
Originally Posted by marshall View Post
I appreciate Karthik's question here. It's a good one to ask. I can't help but think he is either scouting with it or trolling us all though...
None of the above. I just thought this exercise was an interesting one. I know it's a question I struggle to answer myself, and also one that reveals a lot when you think about it and try to answer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by marshall View Post
I now know that one of the things to look for in an alliance partner has nothing to do with their strategy or their robot but rather their determination and drive to win.
It's nearly impossible to quantify and very difficult to determine, but it's an important piece of criteria that can serve as a very beneficial deciding factor when comparing teams which are relatively even statistically.
__________________
:: Karthik Kanagasabapathy ::
"Enthusiasm is one of the most powerful engines of success. When you do a thing, do it with all your might. Put your whole soul into it. Stamp it with your own personality. Be active, be energetic, be enthusiastic and faithful and you will accomplish your object. Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm" -- R.W. Emerson
My TEDx Talk - The Subtle Secrets of Success
Full disclosure: I work for IFI and VEX Robotics, and am the Chairman of the VEX Robotics and VEX IQ Game Design Committees
.
Reply With Quote
  #56   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 16:23
evanperryg's Avatar
evanperryg evanperryg is offline
IT'S THE BUMP N' DUMP
AKA: Evan Grove
FRC #4536 (The Minutebots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 657
evanperryg has a reputation beyond reputeevanperryg has a reputation beyond reputeevanperryg has a reputation beyond reputeevanperryg has a reputation beyond reputeevanperryg has a reputation beyond reputeevanperryg has a reputation beyond reputeevanperryg has a reputation beyond reputeevanperryg has a reputation beyond reputeevanperryg has a reputation beyond reputeevanperryg has a reputation beyond reputeevanperryg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisfl View Post
...
Wisconsin, Carver (Midwest and Carson if you want to focus on the first seed)... I'd keep going but I don't need to.

I've always subscribed to the idea that winning is the highest priority. Winning is what gets you further and further each season. Of course, seeding high is generally a result of winning, but the seed itself doesn't decide how good you actually are, and it doesn't decide if you go to champs.

At an average-sized event, 45-60 teams, the last pick was better than the rest in some way. Even at an event with 30 teams, the 24th pick likely did something right, that placed them above the three other teams available to the first seed alliance. And, if they won the event, that last pick bot should be proud, because they contributed something to that first seed alliance that made it stronger than the rest, whether that be good defense, a simple yet effective pass-through assist, or the extra weight for two ramps plus the ability to put up a few extra points. Even a backup bot can contribute massively to an alliance. 1089 may have only played once in championship elims, but their immense patience and determination to help us in our cheesecake adventure was amazing. And, even in the one match they played, they made vital contributions to the alliance.

FRC isn't about blue banners, it's about inspiring students through hands-on engineering in a competitive setting. However, there's something undeniably inspirational about winning.
__________________
FRCDesigns Contributor | "There is only one corner of the universe you can be certain of improving, and that's your own self." -Aldous Huxley
2012-2016 | FRC Team 2338: Gear it Forward
2013
Wisconsin Regional Winner 2014 Midwest Regional Finalist 2015 Midwest Regional Chairman's Award, Finalist, Archimedes Division Champion, IRI Semifinalist 2016 Midwest Regional Chairman's Award, Finalist, Archimedes Division Gracious Professionalism Award, R2OC Winner
2015 | FTC Team 10266: Mach Speed
2015
Highland Park Qualifier Winner, Motivate Award
2017-???? | FRC Team 4536: The Minutebots

Thanks to the alliances and friends I've made along the way: 33 74 107 111 167 171 234 548 1023 1089 1323 1625 1675 1732 1756 2064 2077 2122 2202 2358 2451 2512 2826 3936 3996 4039 4085 4241 5006 5401 5568 5847 5934
Reply With Quote
  #57   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 19:52
The other Gabe's Avatar
The other Gabe The other Gabe is offline
Too many events, not enough time
AKA: I'm a volunteer now!
no team (2046 Bear Metal Alumn)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 429
The other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud ofThe other Gabe has much to be proud of
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ginger Power View Post
Also any time you can attain captain status you've done well regardless of the competiton. I'd argue there isn't an FRC event out there where being a captain is no big deal to the average team.
This. Becoming a Captain is hard. In 2014, our team was never a captain, despite being one of the top 3 robots in our first two district events (the scheduling gods kinda hate us).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monochron View Post
I predict if the first question didn't involve you qualifying for Champs there would be a big difference.
definitely

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe G. View Post
  • 2015: Pure canburgling robots, with well made, robust, well-engineered systems, which were too integral to the design to be upgraded enough to be competitive with elite or even semi-elite "swinging post" style canburglers.
Your post was beautiful and brilliant, but I would add that some "next 4334's" (including 4334) attempted designs around uprighting the last row of totes (not that that was useful, as it turned out)

sorry, this is mostly just quoting people. I'm loving the conversation around this; it's a brilliant topic.
__________________
Do the best you can with what you are given

FRC 2046 2012-2015
Field Scout lead 2014-2015

Last edited by The other Gabe : 13-08-2015 at 19:58. Reason: premature submission
Reply With Quote
  #58   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 20:46
Anupam Goli's Avatar
Anupam Goli Anupam Goli is offline
PCH Q&A co-founder/Scouting Mentor
AKA: noops
FRC #1648 (G3 Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 1,242
Anupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond reputeAnupam Goli has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

So at first I voted 1A and 2B. I feel like this question says about not just a person, but an entire team honestly. In my FIRST career, I've been at the very bottom, with a robot that couldn't score all season and ranked last, to most recently winning a regional and earning our spot to the championship. All throughout that career, I've always wanted to be the #1 seed and to win the competition. I was always of the opinion that being as close to that as possible meant we were improving. I'd rather be the dominant team on the field than sit and wait to be chosen, even if it means I don't get the banner. Of course, a trip to championships is a great catalyst for change, but it just feels so much better when you're the one choosing or the one contributing the most.

At championships, I've always had the goal of just making eliminations. So at first I chose option 2B, but now that I think about it, I feel like being just an alliance captain that exits quarters is more satisfying in my mind. It means our bot played well enough (or we got lucky enough I suppose) to seed high among all of the great teams at worlds. A world championship would do wonders for a program even as a 4th robot, but it feels so much sweeter to be a captain and know your program and bots are getting to that level.
__________________
Team 1002: 2008-2012
Team 1648: 2012-2016
Georgia Tech Class of 2016
Reply With Quote
  #59   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 21:32
piersklein piersklein is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 67
piersklein is a jewel in the roughpiersklein is a jewel in the roughpiersklein is a jewel in the roughpiersklein is a jewel in the rough
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

This year my team was picked as a second pick both of our two district events. In the first one we were the last robot and picked up by the 1st seed and we won the event. Despite our 2014 season being successful, this one day of matches has been the most important one for me personally. Due entirely to team 1519's belief that we were worthwhile as partners, our scoring improved, our confidence improved, and I was able be mentored by a team that wins constantly. Soley for this reason, being picked last is completely worth it to me. Also due to this, our next event we improved greatly and in eliminations scored many of our alliance's points. However, we were knocked out in the quarterfinals due to a few mistakes.

Here's the dilemma: Because we were the last pick we earned almost no district points and as a result did not make it to district championships. But I would not have changed that for the world because the amount I learned from the highest seeded teams is so much more than what NECMP is worth.

TL;DR: 1B, 2B because learning is the most important thing, even in the district system
__________________
2016 Boston Semifinalists
2016 UMass Dartmouth Creativity Award, Quarterfinalist
2015 Northeastern Quarter Finalists (6th rank)
2015 UMass Dartmouth Winners
2014 RISM Rookie Inspiration Award, Semifinalists.
2014 NorthEastern Rookie All-star, Highest Rookie Seed, Semifinalists.
2014 NECMP- Highest Rookie Seed
Reply With Quote
  #60   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-08-2015, 23:02
tindleroot tindleroot is offline
Free Scouting Help to All
AKA: Casey LeeVan
FRC #4272 (Maverick Boiler Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 595
tindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond reputetindleroot has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Alliance Captain versus last pick in Alliance Selection

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anupam Goli View Post
I feel like being just an alliance captain that exits quarters is more satisfying in my mind.
Yes, being a captain is pretty satisfying at worlds, I suppose. Our team has competed in the championship playoffs many years, but the past two have been our only time as alliance captains. However, we lost in the quarters both times and that was NOT fun for competitive team members like me.

In 2009 we were the second pick by the #2 alliance that missed Einstein by 6 points. I wasn't on the team then but I would hazard a guess that they had a more inspirational Saturday than we did this past year, regardless of how well we seeded.

I chose 1A and 2B.
__________________
2012-2013: FTC 4601 (student)
2014-2015: FRC 135 (student) - 5 banners in 2 years!
2016-present: FRC 4272 (mentor)

Thanks to all of our alliance partners!
11, 51, 68, 201, 234, 868, 1108, 1241, 1760, 3147, 3301, 3487, 3865, 4269, 4485, 4580, 5188

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:22.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi