|
Re: pic: Parts of a robotics competition match
Folks - It might sound like I think that this diagram is so close to perfect that it can't be improved. That's not the case.
Instead, I think that some radically different, but equally accurate, diagrams/descriptions of what makes up a robotics competition are possible/likely.
That said, I posted this to try to create a common view that could be used when discussing simulations of robots and/or competition matches. In particular I hope it will be useful to folks contributing to this thread FRC Simulator Features Ideas
However, if someone has a different view, or wants to suggest an important change in this view, please post or upload what you are thinking.
Blake
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
|