Go to Post Dave: THEY'RE NOT DOLLIES THEY'RE MY FRIENDS! - Dorienne [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-10-2015, 18:08
Hallry's Avatar
Hallry Hallry is offline
Dare to be FIRST
AKA: Ryan Hall
FRC #1676 (Pascack Pi-oneers)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Woodcliff Lake NJ *Now in Newark DE
Posts: 2,673
Hallry has a reputation beyond reputeHallry has a reputation beyond reputeHallry has a reputation beyond reputeHallry has a reputation beyond reputeHallry has a reputation beyond reputeHallry has a reputation beyond reputeHallry has a reputation beyond reputeHallry has a reputation beyond reputeHallry has a reputation beyond reputeHallry has a reputation beyond reputeHallry has a reputation beyond repute
[FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

Posted on the FRC Blog, 10/12/15: http://www.usfirst.org/roboticsprogr...ns-Definitions

Quote:
Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

Blog Date: Monday, October 12, 2015 - 16:45

Hello Teams,

The most prestigious team award in FIRST is, and I believe always will be, the Chairman’s Award. For a team to earn this award, they must be able to describe, among other accomplishments, their initiatives in supporting other teams. In doing so, teams often use phrases like “we started x FLL teams” or “we mentored y FRC teams”. As teams may have different definitions of what terms like ‘started’ or ‘mentored’ mean in this context, it can be difficult for Chairman’s Award Judges to compare accomplishments between teams.

To help solve this problem, the Hall of Fame teams have developed a common set of team support definitions for teams applying for Chairman’s Award to use. You will find them in the ‘Chairman’s Award Submission Definitions’ PDF here. A link to this document can also be found on this page. Teams applying for Chairman’s Award for the 2016 FRC season will be required to adhere to these definitions when describing their support for other teams. This will help Judges know, for example, that one team’s ‘started’ will be comparable to another team’s ‘started’.

Please recognize that FIRST and the FIRST community value all your efforts in supporting other teams, regardless of what form that support comes in, or what particular Chairman’s Award definition of support your action meets. By implementing these defined terms, we’re not attempting in any way to minimize the work you are doing, but to give our Chairman’s Award Judges a common vocabulary to use in their very difficult task of determining the most deserving teams for this incredibly important award.

I want to thank the Hall of Fame teams for developing these definitions, it’s a wonderful service to the FIRST community!

Frank
__________________
[2009-2013]: Team 1676 Student, Co-CEO, Carpentry Lead
[2013-Present]: Team 1676 Alumnus/College Mentor

Won: 2010 New Jersey Regional, 2010 Virginia Regional (undefeated), 2011 New Jersey Regional, 2011 Virginia Regional, 2011 Brunswick Eruption, 2012 Rutgers MAR District, 2012 girlPOWER, 2012 Ramp Riot, 2013 Bridgewater-Raritan MAR District, 2014 girlPOWER, 2015 Bridgewater-Raritan MAR District, 2016 Mt. Olive MAR District, 2016 Bridgewater-Raritan MAR District
2016 Season Recap Video: http://tinyurl.com/1676-2016
Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-10-2015, 18:23
Caleb Sykes's Avatar
Caleb Sykes Caleb Sykes is offline
Registered User
FRC #4536 (MinuteBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 1,059
Caleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

I really like this. Providing a standard vocabulary should make Chairman's applications easier for teams, since they won't have to worry about misrepresenting themselves. Furthermore, it will, along with the published winning Chairman's submissions, provide greater accountability in the FRC community. I'm glad these definitions are provided to us during our first year of creating a Chairman's submission.

Thank you Frank and the HoF teams!
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-10-2015, 19:08
wilsonmw04's Avatar
wilsonmw04 wilsonmw04 is offline
Coach
FRC #1086 (Blue Cheese)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Midlothian, VA
Posts: 1,887
wilsonmw04 has a reputation beyond reputewilsonmw04 has a reputation beyond reputewilsonmw04 has a reputation beyond reputewilsonmw04 has a reputation beyond reputewilsonmw04 has a reputation beyond reputewilsonmw04 has a reputation beyond reputewilsonmw04 has a reputation beyond reputewilsonmw04 has a reputation beyond reputewilsonmw04 has a reputation beyond reputewilsonmw04 has a reputation beyond reputewilsonmw04 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

The definitions are straight forward. What I love is the requirement that the team being helped has to agree to the relationship or that the help took place. Would this mean that teams will have to submit the team numbers or substantiating documentation to put these claims in the chairman's essay?
__________________
Currently: Coach FRC 1086/FTC 93
2006-2011 Coach FRC 2106/FTC 35
If you come to a FRC event to see a robot competition, you are missing the point.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-10-2015, 19:26
PayneTrain's Avatar
PayneTrain PayneTrain is offline
Q&A Dartboard Detractor
AKA: Lizard King
FRC #0422 (The Meme Tech Pneumatic Devices)
Team Role: Mascot
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: RVA
Posts: 2,259
PayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

Not to descend into my standard winter/spring behavior too early, but why does this matter if there isn't really a lot of teeth to this? I think it's a step forward but how is this actually supposed to be enforced significantly better than what we had before?
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-10-2015, 19:29
Christopher149 Christopher149 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0857 (Superior Roboworks) FTC 10723 (SnowBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Houghton, MI
Posts: 1,103
Christopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

By "event", do they mean JFLL Expo / FLL, FTC tournament / FRC district competition or just a generic "event"?
__________________
2015-present: FTC 10723 mentor
2012-present: 857 mentor
2008-2011: 857 student

2015: Industrial Design, Excellence in Engineering, District Finalist, Archimedes Division (#6 alliance captain)
2014: Judges Award, District Engineering Inspiration, District Finalist, Galileo Division

Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-10-2015, 19:45
Jon Stratis's Avatar
Jon Stratis Jon Stratis is offline
Electrical/Programming Mentor
FRC #2177 (The Robettes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,791
Jon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

Quote:
Originally Posted by PayneTrain View Post
Not to descend into my standard winter/spring behavior too early, but why does this matter if there isn't really a lot of teeth to this? I think it's a step forward but how is this actually supposed to be enforced significantly better than what we had before?
Does it need to be enforced? Or does the FIRST ethos of Gracious Professionalism ensure that there's no need to enforce it, so long as everyone is aware of a consistent set of definitions?

Part of the problem we've had in the past, I think, is teams taking credit for "starting" or "mentoring" a team that existed in their school system, even if they didn't have much interaction with them - after all, if they held a kickoff event the team attended, or talked with them once or twice during the season, that's interaction enough, right? Some people/teams may have said so honestly while others did not. Now the new definitions give teams a benchmark to measure themselves against, something they have never had before.
__________________
2007 - Present: Mentor, 2177 The Robettes
LRI: North Star 2012-2016; Lake Superior 2013-2014; MN State Tournament 2013-2014, 2016; Galileo 2016; Iowa 2017
2015: North Star Regional Volunteer of the Year
2016: Lake Superior WFFA
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-10-2015, 19:46
JB987 JB987 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joe Barry
FRC #0987 (HIGH ROLLERS)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: LAS VEGAS
Posts: 1,175
JB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond reputeJB987 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

If teams actually do adhere to these definitions, I would expect to see a dramatic reduction in the number of teams claimed as being started, mentored or events previously claimed as being run by teams... The big question is whether or not judges are going to attempt to verify said claims. Hopefully CA judges won't continue to be swayed so much by the number claims that apparently led to this point...and focus more on the quality and effects of outreach efforts.
__________________
"A genius is just a talented person who does his homework" T. Edison
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-10-2015, 20:09
PayneTrain's Avatar
PayneTrain PayneTrain is offline
Q&A Dartboard Detractor
AKA: Lizard King
FRC #0422 (The Meme Tech Pneumatic Devices)
Team Role: Mascot
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: RVA
Posts: 2,259
PayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis View Post
Does it need to be enforced? Or does the FIRST ethos of Gracious Professionalism ensure that there's no need to enforce it, so long as everyone is aware of a consistent set of definitions?

Part of the problem we've had in the past, I think, is teams taking credit for "starting" or "mentoring" a team that existed in their school system, even if they didn't have much interaction with them - after all, if they held a kickoff event the team attended, or talked with them once or twice during the season, that's interaction enough, right? Some people/teams may have said so honestly while others did not. Now the new definitions give teams a benchmark to measure themselves against, something they have never had before.
I would like to think this is the way it works but I am a bitter cynic with only occasional trust in the "system" to work. It's probably just me and not the environment but w/e.
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-10-2015, 20:35
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,066
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

Quote:
Originally Posted by JB987 View Post
If teams actually do adhere to these definitions, I would expect to see a dramatic reduction in the number of teams claimed as being started, mentored or events previously claimed as being run by teams... The big question is whether or not judges are going to attempt to verify said claims. Hopefully CA judges won't continue to be swayed so much by the number claims that apparently led to this point...and focus more on the quality and effects of outreach efforts.
They won't. It's a logistics issue really; The type of people you want as a judge are the type of people who don't have a lot of free time. Families, jobs, hobbies... they all get in the way. At best the judge will read your essay a week prior your event, maybe mark it up with some things to ask about, then watch your presentation, interact with your students, keep notes, and then after all teams are done, make a decision. I know I've had Chairman's judges who spent the week prior to the event traveling and they had no ability to read the essays in advance. The Chairman's judges (and all judges) are stretched thin as is without the onus of verifying claims.



Of course, this also assumes that the teams actually READ this and take it into account. Not that they have much incentive to do so since ignorance actually benefits them. (but I'm a cynic)
__________________




.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-10-2015, 20:58
PayneTrain's Avatar
PayneTrain PayneTrain is offline
Q&A Dartboard Detractor
AKA: Lizard King
FRC #0422 (The Meme Tech Pneumatic Devices)
Team Role: Mascot
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: RVA
Posts: 2,259
PayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
They won't. It's a logistics issue really; The type of people you want as a judge are the type of people who don't have a lot of free time. Families, jobs, hobbies... they all get in the way. At best the judge will read your essay a week prior your event, maybe mark it up with some things to ask about, then watch your presentation, interact with your students, keep notes, and then after all teams are done, make a decision. I know I've had Chairman's judges who spent the week prior to the event traveling and they had no ability to read the essays in advance. The Chairman's judges (and all judges) are stretched thin as is without the onus of verifying claims.



Of course, this also assumes that the teams actually READ this and take it into account. Not that they have much incentive to do so since ignorance actually benefits them. (but I'm a cynic)
A friend once told me that the crux in judging for FRC is that those with the most "power" at an event typically have the lowest vested interest in utilizing that power in a way that teams would like.

EDIT: While that is a harsh way to generalize it, there may be a nugget of truth there.

I'll try to word the way I view the problem properly without sounding like a total jerk or a hopelessly ignorant fool but there's a good chance I will continue to fail.

Another cynical way I approach this move is that this is the minimum level of transparency of criteria HQ wanted to allow. Maybe FIRST thinks that a pursuit of their own doing concerning enforcing accurate representation of facts and statistics for teams would evolve into a pursuit by teams of calling for accurate representation of facts and statistics that FIRST does or does not publish.

Last edited by PayneTrain : 12-10-2015 at 21:11. Reason: just because you drink 5 rockstar sugarfrees doesnt mean youre coherent enough to post on the internet
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-10-2015, 21:30
Monochron's Avatar
Monochron Monochron is online now
Engineering Mentor
AKA: Brian O'Sullivan
FRC #4561 (TerrorBytes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Research Triangle Park, NC
Posts: 910
Monochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

Best thing since sliced bread. Hope team's honor the requirement.
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-10-2015, 21:37
jajabinx124's Avatar
jajabinx124 jajabinx124 is offline
Team 2052 Alumnus
AKA: Kshitij Wavre
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 540
jajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond reputejajabinx124 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

Awesome changes! Our team discussed a lot about this last season/this off-season and we are happy to see these changes to the definitions.
__________________
FRC Volunteer CSA (MRI off-season event, 2017 Lake Superior Regional, 2017 10,000 Lakes Regional) 2016 - Present
FRC 2052 KnightKrawler (Team Captain, Strategist, Scouting, Programming) 2013 - 2016

1 Division Win & Einstein Appearance
3 Division Quarter-Finalists
1 Regional Chairman's Award
5 Regional Wins, 3 Regional Finalists
3 MN State Championship Wins, 1 MN State Championship Finalist
Thanks to all our alliance partners who krawled with us: 41, 70, 225, 525, 1595, 2054, 2062, 2122, 2175, 2227, 2472, 2526, 2883, 2990, 3018, 3244, 3276, 3310, 3313, 3360, 3538, 3692, 4011, 4198, 4536, 4607, 4778, 5172, 5690
Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-10-2015, 22:32
BrennanB's Avatar
BrennanB BrennanB is offline
TBC is good at getting almost first
AKA: Brennan Bibic
FRC #4476 (W.A.F.F.L.E.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Kingston
Posts: 1,299
BrennanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrennanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrennanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrennanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrennanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrennanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrennanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrennanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrennanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrennanB has a reputation beyond reputeBrennanB has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

Quote:
Originally Posted by PayneTrain View Post
Not to descend into my standard winter/spring behavior too early, but why does this matter if there isn't really a lot of teeth to this? I think it's a step forward but how is this actually supposed to be enforced significantly better than what we had before?
At least it's more obvious to these teams what these definitions are. Before there wasn't even a clear line as to what is really "mentoring" or "started" was. At least people's moral compasses are the enforcer here and the line is clear, which is more than we had before.

Great work FIRST.
__________________

Brennan Bibic - @b_bibic - Eh-Nalysis
10 years of inspiration compilation - W.A.F.F.L.E.S. #4476 YouTube Channel - 64 events and counting!

FRC 2013-2017 (W.A.F.F.L.E.S. Community Robotics #4476) - FLL 2006-2017 (W.A.F.F.L.E.S. #105) - VRC 2010-2013, 2015-2016 (W.A.F.F.L.E.S. #4476)
FRC 2009-2012 (K-Botics #2809)

Fantasy First 2014-2017 (The Breakfast Company) #TBCWin
2014 Dean's List Finalist

"Work until your idols become your rivals."
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-10-2015, 22:33
dag0620 dag0620 is online now
Because we're FiNE
AKA: David Givens
FRC #1071 (Team MAX)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Wolcott, CT
Posts: 784
dag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond reputedag0620 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

Big fan, great idea, happy this is a thing. Props to all that made it happen.
__________________
David Givens
Alumnus Team Max 1071 ('13) | FIRST Volunteer | NE FIRST

Away making magic for a bit...
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-10-2015, 00:08
Jacob Bendicksen's Avatar
Jacob Bendicksen Jacob Bendicksen is offline
Figuring out what's next
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 769
Jacob Bendicksen has a reputation beyond reputeJacob Bendicksen has a reputation beyond reputeJacob Bendicksen has a reputation beyond reputeJacob Bendicksen has a reputation beyond reputeJacob Bendicksen has a reputation beyond reputeJacob Bendicksen has a reputation beyond reputeJacob Bendicksen has a reputation beyond reputeJacob Bendicksen has a reputation beyond reputeJacob Bendicksen has a reputation beyond reputeJacob Bendicksen has a reputation beyond reputeJacob Bendicksen has a reputation beyond repute
Re: [FRC Blog] Chairman’s Award Submissions Definitions

I love the motivation behind this change, and I think the definitions are reasonable and will help judges figure out which teams are most deserving of the Chairman's Award. That being said, I agree with Andrew's point above that a team's ignorance regarding these definitions could end up giving them an advantage, and while I'm not sure what could be done about that, it's unfortunate.
__________________
jacobbendicksen.com | @jacobbendicksen

Yale University Class of 2020

Team 1540 | 2012-2016
7 Chairman's Awards, 6 other awards, 2015 Dean's List Finalist, 1 event win, 2 finalist finishes. Thanks for an amazing ride.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:22.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi