|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#91
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
Quote:
![]() |
|
#92
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
Heh. Reminds me of another "good reason" to make a change.
Ever notice how sometimes the GDC changes the size requirements, seemingly at random? Kinda makes you rework your favorite drivetrain to fit the new sizing. I seem to recall (way back in the day) rumors about rumors about teams pre-building a drivebase before the season, then putting manipulators on top. Next thing you know, the dimensions change... Could be a move just to shake up everybody. That, and... *drumroll* ...FIRST has not announced a replacement for the 775s. Which could very well mean that there isn't one--or it could mean that they'll be springing it on us at Kickoff! Could you imagine watching Kickoff and finding out that there's a replacement motor in that class? |
|
#93
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
Quote:
Since FIRST is open to to adding speed controllers. I am willing to bet at least someone has been pitching a new motor idea for them to consider. |
|
#94
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
Quote:
Ya know... There's a lot of folks who think brushless is a great way to go. The real question is, can you keep a brushless motor from stalling? And... is one in the same power class as a 775 at a reasonable price? (Actually, I'd bet the answer to the second question is "yes", and to the first is "it depends on what I'm using it for".) |
|
#95
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
Quote:
|
|
#96
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
Just pitching a motor isn't sufficient. There needs to be enough donated for a motor (or other electrical component) to be made legal.
|
|
#97
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
Quote:
![]() Keep them from obtaining an insurmountable load |
|
#98
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
Quote:
|
|
#99
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
Brushless motors use completely different controllers (at least three wires to the motor, for one thing). So unless the list of legal motor controllers was partial, brushless motors would not be useful.
|
|
#100
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
Magic smoke. Most of the brushless motors in the hobby market--a likely source for FRC-level motors--are designed to run at speed with light loading. If you put a heavier load on them, they have a hard time.
There was a thread about a year or two ago with a lengthy discussion on benefits/drawbacks of brushless motors. |
|
#101
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
Quote:
|
|
#102
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
Quote:
I agree to your point, a pitch without addressing supply chain and donations would make a poor pitch. |
|
#103
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
Will the PG71 Gearmotors offered on FIRST Choice be Legal? Both have a 775 motor on them
![]() |
|
#104
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
Everything on FIRST Choice is legal by definition. (or maybe not :-) the season rules, rule )
The 775 motors on the PG71's are not Banebot motors which are the only ones that have been discontinued and thus made illegal. Last edited by Mark McLeod : 20-11-2015 at 16:00. Reason: The season rules, rule |
|
#105
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: FRC Blog - 2016 Motor Controllers
The blog post said that the Banebots 775 would not be legal. It did not comment on the illegality of the AndyMark 775. In the past FIRST Choice components have always been FIRST legal.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|