Quote:
Originally Posted by logank013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jessi Kaestle
I did this analysis for all of the Districts since forming. The full analysis can be found here.
A quick analysis of the 2016 growth shows that, with the exception of Michigan, who is currently benefiting from significant state support, as a district becomes more established, their growth tends to diminish.
% Growth for 2016
MI---------------17.97%
MAR------------(-4.96)%
NE---------------0.00%
PNW-------------3.95%
IN----------------2.04%
GA---------------5.00%
NC---------------4.00%
Chesapeake-----6.45%
All Districts------7.07% |
I think I'm confused as to what the percents are showing? Are the decrease in growth each year or the increase in growth per year? Thanks
|
Sorry about the confusion. The data that I ported to CD shows only the growth from 2015 to 2016. Every district with the exception of MAR had positive growth for that period.
However when you look at the overall growth of each district (again with the exception of Michigan which this data just further proves to be AWESOME) it tends to have a spike for the first year or two then start to level out. I have added a graph to the sheet that better shows this.
Never Underestimate the power of zip ties! - tonyargote [more] 
06-11-2015, 08:34
Threaded Mode