Go to Post So remember, we may be envious of teams who can do water jet cutting and has every possible monetary and engineering advantage, but there are many more people who are envious of every team who has a chance to compete. - Rombus [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-11-2015, 08:39
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,062
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 4 Wheels vs 6 for games like 2014

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
Not exactly - all other things equal, assuming a rigid frame, 6 wheel no drop drives of the same wheelbase length will turn about 1/3 better than a 4 wheel drive of the same wheelbase length. 25's drivetrains aren't magic - they just combined a nearly square wheelbase with the benefits of weight being supported by middle wheels. In the era of 28x28 frames, you might not need any drop at all. Of course, it's easy to put a little drop in and just be safe about it, so unless you really need the resistance to turning and can spare the current of more turning resistance, there's no reason not to drop your 6WD center. But I think at this point honestly teams are dropping the middle wheel out of habit / "we know it works" when the practice is to a small extent a relic of the 38x28 era.

I'll pull up the link to the old CD whitepaper in a bit, but the section on tracked drivetrains / statically indeterminate drivetrains applies to this six wheel no drop case.

This.

The big change that happened in (2013?) was the new frame perimeter rules. Prior that we had max dimensions in each direction and it meant you were either building a wide bot that was unstable front to back or a long bot that had a longer wheel base[1]. With the change to a 112" perimeter we were able to optimize differently. Example - 125 ran a 6 wheel flat drive in 2014[3] and had no issues turning because we were effectively 28x28, and when looking at actual points of contact, much wider than we were long.

2015 allowed teams to do whatever they wanted.

Personally, I hope to see a return to frame perimeter rules as it is both easier to inspect than transporting a box[2] and allows teams more flexibility to optimize their chassis shape.




[1] 25 Addendum - No secret sauce, their large wheels usually ended up with contact points roughly square (or close to it) as folks have said in this thread.

[2] That isn't square or always spec'd right

[3] Correction - We started w/ .125 drop, shaved to .09 and then by end of the season we were effectively flat but our frame was also bent to heck because New England.
__________________




.

Last edited by Andrew Schreiber : 13-11-2015 at 10:22.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:28.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi