Top regional winners

[Taylor]

Originally Posted by MaGiC_PiKaChU

Just saying 1114, 2056, 148 and 610 can't all be in alliance #1

Why not? I can think of several scenarios in which that could happen.

[Karthik]

Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber

Possible. Also possible that the events didn't have internet and the data was never saved. Or that it was corrupted. I mean, that was 10 years ago.

2005 was the first year of a new FMS. There were some issues with data reporting that year.

[tindleroot]

Originally Posted by Taylor

Why not? I can think of several scenarios in which that could happen.

Unless FIRST is changing alliances this year, only 3 of those 4 can be on the #1 alliance.

[Knufire]

Originally Posted by tindleroot

Unless FIRST is changing alliances this year, only 3 of those 4 can be on the #1 alliance.

I've seen 4 team alliances before as well (pssst, check your signature).

[tindleroot]

Originally Posted by Knufire

I've seen 4 team alliances before as well (pssst, check your signature).

Not at the Waterloo Regional, though.
Edit: Never mind. (Think before you post)

[Mr. Lim]

Originally Posted by tindleroot

Not at the Waterloo Regional, though.
Edit: Never mind. (Think before you post)

Ontario is a strange place.

We just had an off-season event where 1310 didn't even make it to the eliminations despite being North Bay Regional winners, possessing a solid 3 tote auto, and a good landfill robot capable of putting up multiple capped, noodled 6-stacks.

Anything's possible... (except 2056 losing a regional)

[Koko Ed]

Originally Posted by Karthik

2005 was the first year of a new FMS. There were some issues with data reporting that year.

FLR 2005 had a very rough event with the Hatch scoring system that year.
Thank God for Joe Ross.