Go to Post That's some sexy use of aluminium - Bharat Nain [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-11-2015, 11:51
Jessi Kaestle's Avatar
Jessi Kaestle Jessi Kaestle is offline
Registered User
FRC #1712 (Dawgma)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Upper Darby, PA
Posts: 65
Jessi Kaestle has a brilliant futureJessi Kaestle has a brilliant futureJessi Kaestle has a brilliant futureJessi Kaestle has a brilliant futureJessi Kaestle has a brilliant futureJessi Kaestle has a brilliant futureJessi Kaestle has a brilliant futureJessi Kaestle has a brilliant futureJessi Kaestle has a brilliant futureJessi Kaestle has a brilliant futureJessi Kaestle has a brilliant future
Re: Mythical Six Week Build Season

This topic seems to come up every year, and on average the general consensus here seems to trend towards eliminating Stop Build Day. I have two main counters to this trend.

Mentor/Team Burn-Out and Level-Loading Higher and Lower Resource Teams: I grouped these together because they are connected when it comes to the lower resource teams. Though some have brought it up, it seems to me from reading this thread that some here have lost sight that Chief Delphi is not a proper sampling of FIRST Robotics Competition Teams as a whole. Most lower resource teams that I have talked with drastically reduce how long they meet in the weeks between stop build day and competition. So when deciding if mentor (and/or student) burn-out would happen, remember that you should be thinking of the teams that struggle to have enough mentors (and/or students) during build season due to the current time commitments already being a massive deterrent. As a result I don’t think the elimination of stop-build day will level-load these teams with their higher-resource counterparts, if anything it might just move them further down the bracket in terms of competitiveness.

Teaching Real-World Engineering: This to me is the larger, if not largest, reason to keep stop build day. Whenever I am explaining FIRST to someone who is deciding if they are going to provide me something* based on what the program is I ALWAYS use that it teaches “Real-World Engineering” as a selling point. Then go on to explain that the students have a strict timeline, budget, and build constraints like they will once (if?) they get an engineering job post-grad. In addition to being a selling point, it is also a good teaching point. Once these students enter the work force they will not have a deadline that they get to decide (teams decide which events they do, if we eliminate stop build day, this will become a bigger deal than it already is), nor will they have extended time to study and analyze the competition then completely rework their work to take advantage of the lessons they learned from their competition.**

*the something could be team based such as funding or mentors; student based such as a scholarship or university admissions offer; event based such as volunteers; or personal based such as a job offer.

**This already happens to an extent, but I envision would get worse if stop build day was eliminated.
__________________
See first, think later, then test. But always see first. Otherwise you will only see what you were expecting. Most scientists forget that. - Douglas Adams
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi