|
|
|
 Our prototypes are good and running, now just need to do some magic to transform all that wood to aluminum. :eek: - FIRSTMa2104 [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Our prototypes are good and running, now just need to do some magic to transform all that wood to aluminum. :eek: - FIRSTMa2104 [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
23-03-2003, 17:51
|
|||
|
|||
|
All teams get educated and inspired by going to regionals. Last year my team got dead last (53rd out of 53) at the St. Louis regional, but we had a blast. If FIRST does ever go to a system where you would have to qualify for nationals, I would still want there to be a huge number of teams in attendance. If they took, say, every team that participated in the elimination rounds at regionals, I would be perfectly happy with that. I don't agree with the 'half the teams can go to nats this year, but the other half has to work' rule. It's getting sort of ridiculous. And besides, if a team doesn't make it to nationals, wouldn't that inspire them to achieve even more the next year so they could qualify then?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| qualifying for nationals | AlbertW | Championship Event | 1 | 11-03-2003 02:39 |
| Qualifying and Divided Nationals-- thoughts? | archiver | 2001 | 14 | 23-06-2002 22:21 |
| How about zero qualifying points? | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:01 |
| Qualifying for nats at a regional | patrickrd | General Forum | 1 | 31-03-2002 10:42 |
| What's the best qualifying rounds strategy? | Ken Leung | General Forum | 24 | 24-03-2002 18:25 |
Threaded Mode