|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wheel Spacing Ratios
I have seen a couple of these discussions pop up lately:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=139936 http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=139171 Past discussions: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=86443 http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=129521 http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=116836 There are a few white papers and calculators out for this is well. I wanted to take a more simplistic approach to this and just look at wheel spacing ratios. Assumptions: - All wheels are loaded and spaced evenly - 6 wheel no drop has 2/3 effective length of 4 wheel - 6 wheel drop has 1/2 the effective length of 4 wheel - 8 wheel 2 center drop has 1/3 the effective length of 4 wheel ![]() It seems the KOP drive is as good of standard as any in FIRST, which has had a 1.8 width to length ratio over the years. The current no drop KOP wide configuration has around a 2.5 with the 2/3 effective length of the 6 wheels. The drive in a day (DIAD) from vex appears to be around a 2.3 width to length ratio, but they have a few patterns to choose from. Is the 1.8 number an acceptable minimum for width to length wheel contact patches? Should there be a maximum width to length ratio? Does center drop matter with length? (the opposite wheel clearance is twice the drop distance) Last edited by Deke : 03-12-2015 at 07:13. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|