|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 1658 flying inverse differential swerve Video+CAD files
Can you guys tested pushing stuff with it yet?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team 1658 flying inverse differential swerve Video+CAD files
Why are motors making so much noise even when it's not moving? Feels like a car on neutral
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team 1658 flying inverse differential swerve Video+CAD files
when it's not moving it doesn't make any noise. However when we go at low speeds in Differential mode then indeed it is a noisy machine. That's because the top motors are going full speed and the bottom motors are going nearly full speed the opposite direction. So there are a few parts spinning at very high speeds. That's kind of the whole point of the differential system, we can have high power at very low speeds.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 1658 flying inverse differential swerve Video+CAD files
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team 1658 flying inverse differential swerve Video+CAD files
it all depends how you want to run the cims. There are various modes of operation which is one of the nice things about the design. We can certainly chose what reference speed the cims run at for varied effects such as most efficiency, or most available power(all out) or anything in between. We will certainly be playing with various methods but as far as which ones we end up using,who knows.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team 1658 flying inverse differential swerve Video+CAD files
Is it a correct statement that it is impossible to stall the top motor? If so it seems like it'd be a good candidate for a lighter and more efficient open-air motor (new 775, e.g.) so long it's geared correctly.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team 1658 flying inverse differential swerve Video+CAD files
you can still stall out the motors and while it would work to a degree the total capable speed and power is still reliant on both of the motors so if you used a 775 you will lose in both regards compared to a cim.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team 1658 flying inverse differential swerve Video+CAD files
I'm curious about that worm gear that you've got. It looks 3D printed - is that right? Can you give us some specs and tell us how you made it? Does it seem like it will be sturdy enough to hold up well?
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team 1658 flying inverse differential swerve Video+CAD files
Quote:
As far as specs/how it was made take a look at the CAD files. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team 1658 flying inverse differential swerve Video+CAD files
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team 1658 flying inverse differential swerve Video+CAD files
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team 1658 flying inverse differential swerve Video+CAD files
Quote:
Or at least that's what we think, could be wrong. The whole point of building the prototype was/is to find out if we're just kind of wrong or completely wrong XD |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team 1658 flying inverse differential swerve Video+CAD files
We did some small tests but no video of it. Nothing is properly setup(the robot is 80 lbs short so traction is very low, we're using clamps to hold some parts on, the chain doesn't have proper guides/tensioners, need more time to refine and implement more code, etc...) so there would be little point in even attempting it. This prototype was a proof of concept and it succeeded at that task for our needs. Real testing will be after we see what the game is to see if we want to continue on this route at which point we will attempt a competition rated prototype.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|