|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 610's Preseason Drive
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 610's Preseason Drive
Quote:
+1 for column buckling formulas |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 610's Preseason Drive
Quote:
I hadn't considered buckling, so I took a stab at the numbers. I estimate the buckling load thusly (ignoring the pocketing of the tube because I'm not able to do it with FEA at this time): Fixed-fixed: n=4 I=0.034 in^4 (2x1x1/16) E=1E7 psi (aluminum) L=24 in F=23000 lbs Let's err on the side of maximizing preload. Even a very fancy grade 8 1/4-20 bolt is listed as having a clamping force of 2860lbs, so it's about an order of magnitude away from buckling under the preload alone. Granted, this doesn't say much about sensitivity to side loads. It's been a few years since I've broken out the calculations for side loads to trigger buckling, so I'd be very interested if you can estimate that under these simplified parameters. I'll happily concede buckling is a concern with a slender, compressively loaded member, but I don't think 610's preseason chassis is near that state yet. Again, this ignores the pocketing, which'll of course weaken things, but is a separate design choice. For preload to reduce bending: It seems sensible to me that preloading the tube axially, to ensure a compressive stress state, prevents a tensile component and thus reduces the risk of a bending failure. The shear stress increases, but again, I think it's within what the aluminum can handle. As it's statically indeterminate, I'm not sure how to crunch the numbers without setting up a simulation. Finally, to look a bit further into the source you provided (Step 10): Quote:
|
|
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 610's Preseason Drive
Quote:
Yeah, sorry. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wow, you guys are thinking about this a lot more than we did
In our previous designs going back to 2010, roll pins are used in the corners of the tube to align them, and everything is held together with threaded rod. The reason then was it saved having to machine end blocks for the tubes. Now it's easier for us to make end blocks, and yet we still like the threaded rod. The frame joint feels a lot stiffer when you can preload it. Is this a significant difference? Probably not. |
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 610's Preseason Drive
It looks like with 2.5" wide tube you can fit 2 sprockets and one of the 0.875" colsons inside of the tube. Would you guys consider doing something like this?
![]() CAD Last edited by notmattlythgoe : 12-22-2015 at 03:43 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|