|
|
|
 Off season? More like on season, our season is always on. - joeweber [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Off season? More like on season, our season is always on. - joeweber [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In my opinion, the abillity to manipulate the goals effectively is going to set the 'ever so popular' goal manipulation robots apart. I believe when designing this game, the designers new goal manipulation was going to be popular (the miscellaneous robot polls seem to agree). That's probably why they made the goals so heavy. To answer you're question, some other teams are probably having problems too. I heard somewhere that it only takes about 30lbs of force to push a goal, but turning is probably a different story. It depends on how you're trying to turn. Pivoting may put a greater strain on the system than a gradual turning radius. Maybe try a different method of handling. I Hope that I was of help.
~Hubicki~ |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need a FIRST Robotics control system | kershawrobotics | General Forum | 3 | 07-07-2003 09:49 |
| Curie Division Robots information... (not complete) | archiver | 2001 | 3 | 24-06-2002 03:13 |
| Stategy Debate: Goals Horizontal vs Goals Vertical | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 23-06-2002 23:32 |
| WOW ! | Mike Schroeder | General Forum | 12 | 12-03-2002 21:32 |
| more control options | smokescreen | Technical Discussion | 17 | 05-03-2002 15:41 |
Hybrid Mode
