Go to Post Honestly, no one at a FIRST competition is gonna judge you. Chances are, there are least 20 people dorkier than you. - JohnnyB [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Worst FRC game
Recycle Rush 214 49.08%
Aerial Assist 9 2.06%
Ultimate Ascent 1 0.23%
Rebound Rumble 4 0.92%
Logomotion 11 2.52%
Breakaway 12 2.75%
Lunacy 112 25.69%
FIRST Overdrive 12 2.75%
Rack 'n Roll 1 0.23%
Aim High 1 0.23%
Triple Play 1 0.23%
FIRST Frenzy: Raising the Bar 2 0.46%
Stack Attack 24 5.50%
Zone Zeal 3 0.69%
Diabolical Dynamics 21 4.82%
Co-Opertition FIRST 8 1.83%
Voters: 436. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-01-2016, 18:50
PayneTrain's Avatar
PayneTrain PayneTrain is offline
Trickle-Down CMP Allocation
AKA: Lizard King
FRC #0422 (The Meme Tech Pneumatic Devices)
Team Role: Mascot
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: RVA
Posts: 2,240
PayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond repute
Re: POLL: Worst FRC game

I voted for Zone Zeal. You know, the game that spawned the greatest robot before the 3v3 era. Why? No game has ever been so fundamentally flawed since the 1v1v1 era (I know little of 1v1v1 era) that it allowed for such an ironclad chokehold strategy. When 71 was fully functional, there was a zero percent chance any other combination of two teams in FRC could beat them.

2001 and 2003 failed because the rules were broken in the way that they tried to force the way we play robots into a way that doesn't work.

2009 and 2015 failed because they were games designed to shift the design paradigm, which is something that teams of all ages have difficulty handling, unless they possess the agility of powerhouse team that comes with a mentor roster stacked with a mindboggling combined years of FRC experience. A game that plays like an ugly mess isn't the problem with a bad game as much as it's a symptom of the game design backing teams into a corner.

Those 4 games all are cases where you can see where the GDC flew close to the sun in trying something interesting (you can say that claim is dubious for 2003, I guess, but it had some pretty interesting elements involved)


2002 was just a failure borne of either ignorance or indifference to the chokehold. If 2016 ends up being a game I could describe as being one borne of ignorance or indifference, can you imagine the backlash with how much money and time is put into this sport now compared to 14 years ago?
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi