Go to Post We were all rookies once, and we really have two ways to go about things: either take a page from the powerhouses and emulate their style, or complain about not having anything and risk falling into oblivion. - George A. [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Most unused defenses?
Portcullis 34 17.53%
Cheval de Frise 32 16.49%
Moat 44 22.68%
Ramparts 17 8.76%
Drawbridge 22 11.34%
Sally Port 29 14.95%
Rock Wall 18 9.28%
Rough Terrain 33 17.01%
None 7 3.61%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 194. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-01-2016, 18:14
Redo91's Avatar
Redo91 Redo91 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Justin
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Carlsbad
Posts: 147
Redo91 is a glorious beacon of lightRedo91 is a glorious beacon of lightRedo91 is a glorious beacon of lightRedo91 is a glorious beacon of lightRedo91 is a glorious beacon of lightRedo91 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Most unused defense of 2016?

Category A: Portcullis v. Cheval de Frise

The Portcullis allows for has one part to move, and can be contacted in on place, but it must be lifted over the height of the robot passing through. A short robot could possibly have a passive mechanism that allows them to drive under the Portcullis.

The Cheval de Frise could be contacted in one place if the robot was shorter than the width of three of the tilting platforms, but would require some finer alignment. CoG of the robot will need to have attention paid to it.

There is opportunity for one mechanism to be capable of handling both these DEFENSES.

Category B: Moat v. Ramparts

The Moat and Ramparts are two parts of the same issue, a robot's CoG and potential high-centering. Given a low enough CoG and proper clearance, a robot should be able to just as easily pass over either of these.

Category C: Drawbridge v. Sally Port

The Drawbridge and Sally Port are both interesting DEFENSES. They will be easily opened from the courtyard side, needing nothing more than robots capable of traversing the field. Trying to tackle these two DEFENSES from the front will prove to be time consuming.

These DEFENSES can be tackled relatively quickly with the ALLIANCE working together by having one robot open the DEFENSE and the other two robots come through.

Both of these DEFENSES will be time consuming for those that do not plan before the match. They will pose no issue for prepared ALLIANCES.

Category D: Rock Wall v. Rough Terrain

Remember how intimidating the Barrier from Rebound Rumble appeared? The Rock Wall is only a half inch taller. Teams that design for it will have no issue crossing this DEFENSE. Also, any robot capable of traversing the Rock Wall should have no issue with the DEFENSES from Category B.

The Rough Terrain would prove quite a bit more difficult. due to the varying heights and one and a half inch gaps between the tubing pieces, there are plenty of opportunities for robots to get wheels stuck or high center.

Low Bar

The Low Bar is straight forward in its method. If you are too tall, you have to pass by one of the other DEFENSES.
__________________
Team 1296-Full Metal Jackets
Alumni 2009
Mentor 2009-2014

Team 624-CRyptonite
Mentor 2014-2015
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi