G28 + G11 seems broken

[blarson001]

Originally Posted by Kevin Sevcik

Nope. If RED is minding its business in the RED courtyard in the last 20 (for whatever reason), and BLUE drives into RED, BLUE should get a G11, because it's trying to create a G28 foul that otherwise wouldn't have occurred.

But if Red is there trying to force Blue to cause a G11, doesn't that mean Red gets a G11?

[Jaxom]

Originally Posted by thatnameistaken

A Q&A submission should definitely clear things up.

Apparently you've not read many Q&A answers.

[thatnameistaken]

Originally Posted by Jaxom

Apparently you've not read many Q&A answers.

Originally Posted by thatnameistaken

A Q&A submission should make things even more confusing, before possibly being eventually solved by a team update.

Better?

[EricH]

Originally Posted by thatnameistaken

Better?

No.

It will take a minimum of three updates, at least one of which will be in the middle of competition season, to fix. Each update will result in at least two more Q&A questions.

Maybe you should just jump into the Chasm of Despair before the old man starts asking his questions three.

[Jaxom]

Originally Posted by EricH

No.

It will take a minimum of three updates, at least one of which will be in the middle of competition season, to fix. Each update will result in at least two more Q&A questions.

Maybe you should just jump into the Chasm of Despair before the old man starts asking his questions three.

Is that for an African or European Swallow?

[GaryVoshol]

The first words of G11 are, "Strategies aimed solely at" - the question is, what is a strategy?

We don't know that definition yet. It comes up in head ref training each year. And you won't know what is decided until the drivers meeting at the events.

Unless Q&A becomes much more transparent and gives some definitions. But I doubt that; any answer would probably be along the lines of the standard, "We don't comment on hypothetical game situations."