|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you have 4 motors on 40 amp breakers then 4*40=160 - so yes, you can easily trip the 120 without tripping the 40's.
4 Gauge wire: against the rules specified by FIRST - your bot would fail a critical inspection. Putting heavier gauge wire on the battery or other circuits reduces the resisitance, and will give you an (UNFAIR) advantage over teams that followed the rules. Wire melting: where is it melting? at the terminal connection? thats a sign of a bad crimp. You might want to use some solder on the terminal and put heatshrink over it. Two motors on one shaft - not an easy thing to do - the power/torque curves for the two motors are not identical - if they are not geared exactly right then one motor has most of the load. Are your controls damped in SW? the worst thing you can do to your drive train (besides stalling the motors against a wall) is to go from full forward to full reverse. If you did this in your car your drivetrain would be left in the street -but for some reason we think its ok to do this to our bots. You esp need to be carefull in your auton code, backing up then going forward in one step, or going from straight to a tank turn in one step - can throw the motors from 254 to 0 in 26mS. "she was a Day Tripper! one way ticket, yeah it took me Sooooo long to find out but I found out!" -Lennon/McCartney Last edited by KenWittlief : 26-03-2003 at 12:49. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Quote:
We used 4 AWG wire and connectors rated at 120 amps. Apparently our team and 696 were the only ones to do this. We never thought of it as a competitive advantage, when we decided to do it, it was because of safety. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Now, I'm sure there are very few people who are going to consider that a serious issue to the design of a robot. Obviously that .276 V difference probably won't be the difference between winning and losing. However, in some applications it can actually be significant. Don't discount the change out of hand. Remember, wires do have resistances (and inductances for that matter) and they shouldn't be completely ignored until analysis says that you can ignore them. I'd also point out that FIRST has always specified a minimum wire size for safety reasons. At all times, teams have been able to use larger wire with no penalty. FIRST is concerned about safety with wiring in this case, not about competitive advantages. Matt |
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
"3.2 Wiring the Robot Controls 3.2.1 Power Distribution Circuits ...The battery, 120A main circuit breaker/disconnect switch, and the three provided power distribution-circuit breaker panels may only be connected with the AWG #6 wire provided in the kit. Protect all branch circuits by circuit breakers as shown in the table below." So, #4AWG is illegal. As to the change in resistance, many teams use long lengths of #6 wire and even longer runs of #10 to the speed controllers and motors. I think that in many cases these long runs add sufficient resistance to keep teams from getting into trouble by limiting the current in the system as a whole. The difference in resistance of one foot of wire is not that much but when you start adding it all up and passing 200 or more amps through it, the voltage drop is smaller in the #4. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
One thing to note on the rules is that it contradicts its self on this issue.
It does say you must use #6 for main power distribution, but it goes on to say that the stated wire sizes are the minimum allowed. I take this to mean that you must use #6 between the battery and breaker blocks, but other wise may use what ever you wish (as long as it meets the minimum in the rules). So, if you want to replace #10 going to a drill motor with #8, then that is legal. -Andy A. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Joe Ross is right, I stand corrected.
The FIRST Q&A link he provided gave the OK for using larger than 6 gauge wire. :c) -Ken W. |
|
#25
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#26
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Al, There is a contradiction, which is why I asked the previously posted question on the jive forums.
Page 8 of the robot rules says Quote:
Quote:
I wish that FIRST would have issued an update fixing the contradiction, but they didn't and so I go by the jive forums post. |
|
#27
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Joe,
Oh those guys! We try to stop the confusion and....oh well. As long as you didn't get problems from the inspectors. I wasn't able to get to the forum reference from your other post so I couldn't see your reference. See you in Houston?!? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Circuit Breakers | ark_1230 | Electrical | 28 | 09-04-2002 23:16 |
| tripping breakers/burning motors | Ben Mitchell | Motors | 16 | 04-02-2002 13:31 |
| Gearbox Dimensions for the Chiaphua Motors | Larry Barello | General Forum | 8 | 16-01-2002 11:01 |