Go to Post Best way to get the word out for FIRST is Demo, Demo, Demo. There's no reason anyone in your community shouldn't know what you folks are doing. - Martinez [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2016, 15:50
IronicDeadBird's Avatar
IronicDeadBird IronicDeadBird is offline
Theory Crafting Fo days...
AKA: Charles Ives "M" Waldo IV
FRC #1339 (Angelbots)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 941
IronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond repute
Boulder shenanigans

Is each team in charge of knowing how many boulders are in the opposing castle?

Situation:
If the opposing team has 5 boulders in the castle and I am aware of that and my team at that instance can score two boulders should I score one and wait until the opposing team introduces one onto the field or can our team score both?

G34 No more than six (6) BOULDERS may remain in a CASTLE at any time. If the BOULDER count ever
exceeds six (6), excess BOULDERS must be introduced to the FIELD immediately.
Violation: FOUL per excess BOULDER

In the situation given if two boulders are scored the opposing side now has 7 boulders which is 1 foul because our team scored. Of Course per G11

G11 Strategies aimed solely at forcing the opposing ALLIANCE to violate a rule are not in the spirit of FIRST Robotics Competition and not allowed. Rule violations forced in this manner will not result in
an assignment of a penalty to the targeted ALLIANCE.
Violation: FOUL. If egregious or repeated, YELLOW CARD

Is it solely one teams burden to keep less then 6 boulders in the castle, or is it the responsibility of both teams.
__________________
HERO 俺を讃える声や 喝采なんて 欲しくはないさ
#GLITTERFORCEHYPE!
Play is for kids this is serious...
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2016, 15:59
alopex_rex's Avatar
alopex_rex alopex_rex is offline
Rainbow Professionalism Dash
AKA: Scott Morton
FRC #0830 (The RatPack)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 92
alopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond reputealopex_rex has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Boulder shenanigans

As I read G34, each team is in charge of making sure their castle doesn't have more than 6 boulders in it. If there's 5 boulders in our castle, and you shoot in 2 more, than our human player has to immediately release at least one of them to the field. We only incur a foul if we let the 7 boulders remain. We have a grace period to get rid of a boulder before we get a foul.

I don't think anyone could violate rule G11 by filling the opponent's castle with boulders. That's one of the primary ways of scoring; classifying it as a "strategy aimed solely at forcing the opposing ALLIANCE to violate a rule" would just be perverse.
__________________
Ratpack programming lead 2013 - 2015

ἔκλαγξαν δ᾽ ἄρ᾽ ὀϊστοὶ ἐπ᾽ ὤμων χωομένοιο / αὐτοῦ κινηθέντος: ὃ δ᾽ ἤϊε νυκτὶ ἐοικώς. (Ancient Greek nerds unite!)

Last edited by alopex_rex : 10-01-2016 at 16:01. Reason: pronoun clarity
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2016, 16:24
GKrotkov's Avatar
GKrotkov GKrotkov is offline
Registered User
AKA: Gabriel Krotkov
FRC #1712 (Dawgma)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Ardmore, PA
Posts: 118
GKrotkov has much to be proud ofGKrotkov has much to be proud ofGKrotkov has much to be proud ofGKrotkov has much to be proud ofGKrotkov has much to be proud ofGKrotkov has much to be proud ofGKrotkov has much to be proud ofGKrotkov has much to be proud of
Re: Boulder shenanigans

The key word in G11 is "solely" (as I read it, of course). Is your strategy of scoring a boulder aimed at making them take a penalty? Perhaps, they can't really know. However, they certainly can see that scoring a boulder would have a benefit for you other than your opponents taking a penalty, and thus, it cannot be the sole reason that you are taking that action.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2016, 16:42
thatnameistaken thatnameistaken is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joshua Johnston
FRC #2191 (Flux Core)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 49
thatnameistaken is on a distinguished road
Re: Boulder shenanigans

In addition to what's been said above, the way I read G34, it's okay to have 7+ boulders so long as the human players immediately pick up the excess and introduce them to the field; as such, you can't really 'force' the foul to get a G11.

The rule might still be flawed, though; check out G33:
Quote:
G33 BOULDERS may only be introduced to the FIELD
A. during TELEOP,
B. by a DRIVER or HUMAN PLAYER, and
C. through one of the holes in the HUMAN PLAYER STATION.
Violation: FOUL per BOULDER
(emphasis mine)

Imagine: the red alliance elects to give all 3 of their auto boulders to their human players, starting the match with 6 boulders in their castle. Then, once auto starts, the blue alliance spy bot scores a boulder in the first few seconds. Now what? The red alliance has 7 boulders; they can't legally introduce one to the field until teleop, nor can they legally keep them all. Are they fouled? Is G11 called on the blue alliance?
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2016, 16:56
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,721
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Boulder shenanigans

Quote:
Originally Posted by thatnameistaken View Post
Imagine: the red alliance elects to give all 3 of their auto boulders to their human players, starting the match with 6 boulders in their castle. Then, once auto starts, the blue alliance spy bot scores a boulder in the first few seconds. Now what? The red alliance has 7 boulders; they can't legally introduce one to the field until teleop, nor can they legally keep them all. Are they fouled? Is G11 called on the blue alliance?
Yikes. It can't be a G11, because it was a strategy to score points, not cause a foul.

Perhaps the "immediately" grace period extends until after Teleop begins. A question for Q&A.
__________________
(since 2004)
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2016, 17:05
thatnameistaken thatnameistaken is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joshua Johnston
FRC #2191 (Flux Core)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 49
thatnameistaken is on a distinguished road
Re: Boulder shenanigans

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryVoshol View Post
Yikes. It can't be a G11, because it was a strategy to score points, not cause a foul.

Perhaps the "immediately" grace period extends until after Teleop begins. A question for Q&A.
Agreed, and that interpretation of 'immediately' is how I expect the GDC to respond.
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2016, 17:05
IronicDeadBird's Avatar
IronicDeadBird IronicDeadBird is offline
Theory Crafting Fo days...
AKA: Charles Ives "M" Waldo IV
FRC #1339 (Angelbots)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 941
IronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond reputeIronicDeadBird has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Boulder shenanigans

Quote:
Originally Posted by thatnameistaken View Post
Agreed, and that interpretation of immediately is how I expect the GDC to respond.
Maybe if we get lucky they will just say chute door.
__________________
HERO 俺を讃える声や 喝采なんて 欲しくはないさ
#GLITTERFORCEHYPE!
Play is for kids this is serious...
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-01-2016, 18:02
ratdude747's Avatar
ratdude747 ratdude747 is offline
Official Scorekeeper
AKA: Larry Bolan
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Madison, IN
Posts: 1,062
ratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond reputeratdude747 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Boulder shenanigans

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryVoshol View Post
Yikes. It can't be a G11, because it was a strategy to score points, not cause a foul.

Perhaps the "immediately" grace period extends until after Teleop begins. A question for Q&A.
I would think so too... as if you interpret it the other way, whatver the human player did they'd get a foul. Be it for breaking the starting line or not purging boulders in time. Still I agree, Q&A should be the ones to say such, so that it gets clarified in the rules.
__________________
Dean's List Semi-finalist 2010
1747 Harrison Boiler Robotics 2008-2010, 2783 Engineers of Tomorrow 2011, Event Volunteer 2012-current

DISCLAIMER: Any opinions/comments posted are solely my personal opinion and does not reflect the views/opinions of FIRST, IndianaFIRST, or any other organization.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:21.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi