|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: G43 loophole
Since there is no definition in the rules for "attempting to traverse", then "attempting" has no meaning withing the rules.
So, how does a ref decide if a robot is "attempting"? Is moving towards the defense attempting? It could be, because The robot is attempting to get to the outer works. There is no way the GDC will allow such an ambiguous definition to stand. Expect a team update where they include "contacting any part of the defense" to the definition of "traversing". Last edited by martin417 : 10-01-2016 at 17:22. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: G43 loophole
Bingo
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: G43 loophole
I very much hope so.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|