Scaling via jack up legs instead of "hanging"?

[FrankJ]

Originally Posted by AndyBare

Interesting, but I still think "normally" perhaps is more vital to - (the configuration in which you were inspected), so if you weren't inspected while standing on jacks, then standing on jacks wouldn't be "standing normally on the floor." If you would normally "stand" on wheels, and your wheels no longer have contact with the floor, are you still "standing normally on the floor?"

Don't over think "normal". You take your robot in whatever operating configurations it might have and set it on level ground. If your bumpers are not in the bumper zone, your robot is not legal. So anything extending to the ground raising the bumpers out of the zone would be illegal. It is up to the team to show all operating configurations to the inspector.

While not specific to this question, if you have an illegal configuration during a match, and it is noticed by the referee, the best result you can hope for is being told to fix it and have your robot reinspected.

[nightpool]

Originally Posted by FrankJ

Don't over think "normal". You take your robot in whatever operating configurations it might have and set it on level ground. If your bumpers are not in the bumper zone, your robot is not legal. So anything extending to the ground raising the bumpers out of the zone would be illegal. It is up to the team to show all operating configurations to the inspector.

While not specific to this question, if you have an illegal configuration during a match, and it is noticed by the referee, the best result you can hope for is being told to fix it and have your robot reinspected.

I don't think this is an "illegal configuration" though—the bumper rules only talk about the "normal" configuration. For a concrete example, in 2013 some teams had a jack that tilted them up 6 or so inches so they could start climbing the tower. Would you say they were violating the bumper rules as well? The theory is the same.

Anyway, I don't believe this is violating the spirit of the bumper rules either. Bumpers are designed to protect the robot from any rough collisions during the game, but during the last 20 seconds there are already heavy penalties again being contacted in any way by an opposing robot while attempting to scale.

[FrankJ]

Originally Posted by nightpool

I don't think this is an "illegal configuration" though—the bumper rules only talk about the "normal" configuration. For a concrete example, in 2013 some teams had a jack that tilted them up 6 or so inches so they could start climbing the tower. Would you say they were violating the bumper rules as well? The theory is the same.

I would have to go back and review the 2013 rules to have an opinion. But this isn't 2013 so that really doesn't matter. The 2016 rules do not reference an "normal configuration". R22 refers to the robot standing normally on a flat floor with configuration unspecified. As opposed to standing on a batten or other obstacle.

[mrnoble]

*sigh*

Some things don't change

[m1tche11d]

Originally Posted by nightpool

For a concrete example, in 2013 some teams had a jack that tilted them up 6 or so inches so they could start climbing the tower. Would you say they were violating the bumper rules as well? The theory is the same.

Do you know the team numbers of any of these teams, so I can find the archived match videos?

Thanks

[nightpool]

Originally Posted by m1tche11d

Do you know the team numbers of any of these teams, so I can find the archived match videos?

Thanks

I know our team built one, but I don't think we ever used it outside of practice matches because the rest of our climbing system was just completely broken. It wasn't an original idea, but I can't think of any offhand, and the few teams I did search didn't turn up any interesting videos.

I did check the 2013 manual though, and there aren't any special exceptions to the bumper rules related to climbing or anything.

the rule in question is almost completely identical:

Originally Posted by Ultimate Ascent R25

BUMPERS must be located entirely within the BUMPER ZONE, which is between 2 and 10 in. from the floor, in
reference to the ROBOT standing normally on a flat floor.

[FrankJ]

The Team update (3.4.5 G19-1 & 4.7-R22 blue box) makes it pretty clear that it is not legal for 2016.

My interpretation of the 2013 rules is that it wasn't legal then, but then I was neither your robot inspector or your referee. The climbing rule was your robot could not be in contact with the floor & get credit so the bumper interpretation was less of an issue.

[MisterG]

Today's team update makes it pretty clear that jack up legs are not legal.

This topic is getting covered pretty thoroughly on the team update thread.

Additions include:

G19-1
ROBOTS must be in compliance with
Section 4.7: BUMPER Rules
throughout the MATCH.
Violation: DISABLED

R22 Blue box added.

This measurement is intended to be made as if the ROBOT is resting
on a flat floor (without changing the ROBOT configuration), not relative
to the height of the ROBOT from the FIELD carpet.
Examples include:
A.
A ROBOT that is at an angle while traversing a DEFENSE has its
BUMPERS outside the BUMPER ZONE. If this ROBOT were virtually
transposed onto a flat floor, and its BUMPERS are in the BUMPER
ZONE, it meets the requirements of R22.
B.
A ROBOT deploys a MECHANISM which lifts the BUMPERS outside
the BUMPER ZONE (when virtually transposed onto a flat floor). This
violates R22.

The second part of the R22 blue box seems to be a direct ruling on jack up scaling.

Re-Edit. Dagnabit. Sniped.
Edit: 100th post; woohoo. Only took me 5 years.

[nightpool]

Yep today's team update certainly clears this up. I feel like this is to the detriment of a lot of the more unusual/interesting strategies for navigating defenses (I expected them just to update the way a scale was scored) but at least its unambiguous now.

[cglrcng]

Originally Posted by nightpool

Yep today's team update certainly clears this up. I feel like this is to the detriment of a lot of the more unusual/interesting strategies for navigating defenses (I expected them just to update the way a scale was scored) but at least its unambiguous now.

And a little less unsafe given the sloped & slick nature of the existing Tower Batter design, as the robot on uneven jacking legs on that particular slope & material at least before reaching the full required height and grabbing the bar (if that was at least intended), would be quite precarious in relation 2 other scaling or surrounding robots. (Not that they also aren't if one is using the usual extend, grab, winch, hang method, amongst others).

Here is to just hoping that latching, grabbing, hooking systems used to grab the unique Bar & Scale the Towers are accurate, robust, automatic, and safe. (Manual unhooking allowance of said latches usually are recommended, as all robots are then disabled at completion of the matches and will not be powered up to effect any unhooking operation by the Robot Drive Team(s). Members).