Quote:
Originally Posted by KrazyCarl92
An alternate interpretation:
Recognizing that working with the other alliance to select mutually beneficial defenses could benefit one's ranking and then NOT choosing to do so is intentionally playing below one's ability.
|
So the real question is who a ref would side with - the team on the alliance who benefited from an 'agreement', or the team on the same alliance that was hurt by the 'agreement'.
6v0 in 2010 was a mechanic, but it was a regrettable one as evidenced by that ranking algorithm not returning.
Geekier than me? That's a goal you can shoot for. You might make it, too -- in twenty years or so. :cool: - Richard Wallace [more] 
11-01-2016, 15:49
Threaded Mode