Go to Post I like anything that is designed to bounce for up to 10 minutes. Expecially if it lands right side up :) - GregT [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 00:21
TimTheGreat's Avatar
TimTheGreat TimTheGreat is offline
ArchdukeTim
FRC #1418 (Vae Victis)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Falls Church
Posts: 236
TimTheGreat has a spectacular aura aboutTimTheGreat has a spectacular aura aboutTimTheGreat has a spectacular aura about
Re: Immobile 200+ pts solo robot concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by Purpose View Post
It'd work for about 30 seconds maybe. According to G21 (A ROBOT contacting carpet in the opponent’s SECRET PASSAGE may not contact opposing ROBOTS), you're allowed to be in their secret passage, but you're not allowed to touch opposing robots in their secret passage. Once the other alliance noticed what you're doing, all they have to do is send one robot to touch you and you'd be at fault and get a tech foul.
Not quite. G11 states that the opposing alliance cannot force a robot to break a rule. So if they touch you it's not a foul on you. In fact, it's a foul on the OTHER team.
__________________
There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult.



2012 - Gracious Professionalism - Greater DC
2014 - Regional Finalist - Virginia | Industrial Design - Virginia | Regional Finalist - Greater DC
2015 - Innovation in Control - Greater DC
2016 - District Event Winner - VAHAY | Innovation in Control - VAHAY | District Event Winner - MDBET | Industrial Design - MDBET | District Champion - CHCMP | Innovation in Control - CHCMP
Reply With Quote
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 00:22
Jared's Avatar
Jared Jared is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 602
Jared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond reputeJared has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Immobile 200+ pts solo robot concept

This thread may be relevant.http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=141277

Also, G11 may apply if they put in two balls at once and force you to control them
Reply With Quote
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 00:23
AndyBare AndyBare is offline
CAD Design and CNC Machinist
FRC #1261 (Robo Lions)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Burnsville, NC
Posts: 200
AndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Immobile 200+ pts solo robot concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by cad321 View Post
The biggest issue I see now (assuming you follow along with the suggestions/updates throughout the thread) is that you would still be susceptible to defense. What stops another team from coming and bumping you while you're shooting?
You could make feet that extend from beneath your robot and make you somewhat immobile.
Reply With Quote
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 00:24
AndyBare AndyBare is offline
CAD Design and CNC Machinist
FRC #1261 (Robo Lions)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Burnsville, NC
Posts: 200
AndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Immobile 200+ pts solo robot concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared View Post
This thread may be relevant.http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=141277

Also, G11 may apply if they put in two balls at once and force you to control them
The G11 might apply to them, correct? Are we on the same page here?
Reply With Quote
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 00:30
Rangel's Avatar
Rangel Rangel is offline
John Rangel
FRC #0842 (Falcon Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 740
Rangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Immobile 200+ pts solo robot concept

If a human player can be fouled with G11 for depositing balls too fast because an opposing robot is forcing the human player to deposit, I'm sure this is a huge oversight by the GDC and will be in a team update or Q&A. Really the robot doesn't even need to score to be effective. By carrying one ball and blocking all but one HP slot, the robot can prevent the human player from putting balls back into play.
__________________
2012 Dean's List Winner
2011-2014 Arizona Regional Winners
2016 Las Vegas Regional Winner
2014-? Mentor


Reply With Quote
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 00:30
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,680
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Immobile 200+ pts solo robot concept

Seems plausible to reduce cycle times, yet an offensive robot coming back to the secret passage to get a ball would put this strategy in a world of hurt. The other alliance bot would push your bot back onto the courtyard carpet, and if you resist or push back you may wind up with a pretty bad foul regardless of whether the other bot initiated the first contact. The offensive bot is simply coming to get boulders, so it's tough to say they intended to force you into a penalty.
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub
Reply With Quote
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 00:30
AndyBare AndyBare is offline
CAD Design and CNC Machinist
FRC #1261 (Robo Lions)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Burnsville, NC
Posts: 200
AndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Immobile 200+ pts solo robot concept

Oh shoot.
Counterweight thing wouldn't work, cause you'd be touching their SP carpet...
Reply With Quote
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 00:32
Purpose's Avatar
Purpose Purpose is offline
President
AKA: Victor A
FRC #0834 (Spartechs)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: MAR
Posts: 26
Purpose will become famous soon enough
Re: Immobile 200+ pts solo robot concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimTheGreat View Post
Not quite. G11 states that the opposing alliance cannot force a robot to break a rule. So if they touch you it's not a foul on you. In fact, it's a foul on the OTHER team.
You know, I forgot about that rule. I think you may be right, it definitely could be applied in this case, but the way I'm reading it, it seems to be a fail safe so teams don't design a robot or an entire game plan revolving around giving other robots fouls. In this case, an opposing robot is in your secret passageway, in the way of the boulder dispenser. You could possibly argue that you needed the dispenser, and it's your alliance's dispenser and they shouldn't be in the way. I don't know, it seems like it's in the air.
Reply With Quote
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 00:38
AndyBare AndyBare is offline
CAD Design and CNC Machinist
FRC #1261 (Robo Lions)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Burnsville, NC
Posts: 200
AndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Immobile 200+ pts solo robot concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by Purpose View Post
You know, I forgot about that rule. I think you may be right, it definitely could be applied in this case, but the way I'm reading it, it seems to be a fail safe so teams don't design a robot or an entire game plan revolving around giving other robots fouls. In this case, an opposing robot is in your secret passageway, in the way of the boulder dispenser. You could possibly argue that you needed the dispenser, and it's your alliance's dispenser and they shouldn't be in the way. I don't know, it seems like it's in the air.
G21 is a super iffy rule right now by itself. Waiting for QA to clear up some question about "contact"
Reply With Quote
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 00:39
BotDesigner's Avatar
BotDesigner BotDesigner is offline
Design/CAD/Strategy/TeamManagement
AKA: David Gedney
FRC #4418 (Team Impulse)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 110
BotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud of
Re: Immobile 200+ pts solo robot concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimTheGreat View Post
Not quite. G11 states that the opposing alliance cannot force a robot to break a rule. So if they touch you it's not a foul on you. In fact, it's a foul on the OTHER team.
But would it be a foul on them by sitting in your secret passage hoping you would touch them forcing a foul on you by you forcing a foul on them. Logically it doesn't make sense because the fouls would go on forever. Foul on you for forcing them to foul you by them forcing you to foul them...
Reply With Quote
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 01:16
Greg Needel's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Greg Needel Greg Needel is offline
REVving up for a new season
FRC #2848 (All-sparks)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,107
Greg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond reputeGreg Needel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Immobile 200+ pts solo robot concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimTheGreat View Post
Not quite. G11 states that the opposing alliance cannot force a robot to break a rule. So if they touch you it's not a foul on you. In fact, it's a foul on the OTHER team.
I guess I don't see this. Since they can clearly have a defender in their own courtyard, as long as no pin comes into play, if they touch you than wouldn't it just be defense and not trying to force a foul.

If I was a ref and I saw a team blocking access to the HP slots that a team was trying to get to there is no way that this would be called as intentionally trying to draw a foul. Additionally I think that an interpretation of G25 might come into play after it was done a few times, as it is intentionally impeding the flow of the match (although none of the definitions clearly define it as such in the current manual)
__________________
Greg Needel│www.robogreg.com
Co-founder REV Robotics LLC www.REVrobotics.com
2014 FRC World Champions with 254, 469, & 74
Reply With Quote
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 01:34
Knufire Knufire is offline
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 740
Knufire has a reputation beyond reputeKnufire has a reputation beyond reputeKnufire has a reputation beyond reputeKnufire has a reputation beyond reputeKnufire has a reputation beyond reputeKnufire has a reputation beyond reputeKnufire has a reputation beyond reputeKnufire has a reputation beyond reputeKnufire has a reputation beyond reputeKnufire has a reputation beyond reputeKnufire has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Immobile 200+ pts solo robot concept

If this was going to work this year, it would have worked in 2012. Which it didn't.
__________________
Team 469: 2010 - 2013
Team 5188: 2014 - 2016
NAR (VEX U): 2014 - Present
Reply With Quote
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 06:56
James Juncker's Avatar
James Juncker James Juncker is offline
Broken Robot Fixer
FRC #2834 (Bionic Black Hawks)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 44
James Juncker will become famous soon enough
What if you had one team mate block the far human player ground input and had the other robot with its wheels outside the SP allowing it to shoot. This way with an extension of 15 inches you would be able to get all of the other alliances boulders as well and have the ability to Launch the boulders as you aren't in contact with any carpet. With this you also make it almost impossible for the other team to push you out of the corner
__________________
The FRC season has 3 steps
Eat
Build
Play

It is important to note that sleep is not included in these steps.
Reply With Quote
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 07:42
AndyBare AndyBare is offline
CAD Design and CNC Machinist
FRC #1261 (Robo Lions)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Burnsville, NC
Posts: 200
AndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of lightAndyBare is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Immobile 200+ pts solo robot concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Juncker View Post
What if you had one team mate block the far human player ground input and had the other robot with its wheels outside the SP allowing it to shoot. This way with an extension of 15 inches you would be able to get all of the other alliances boulders as well and have the ability to Launch the boulders as you aren't in contact with any carpet. With this you also make it almost impossible for the other team to push you out of the corner
Then you'd be fouled for a G25
  • Sub-section B
coordinating a blockade of the FIELD with ALLIANCE members
An example of a blockade would be two (2) or more ROBOTS on the same ALLIANCE working together to “box” an opponent ROBOT into a corner of the FIELD using the GUARDRAIL and the CASTLE WALL.
Reply With Quote
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 12-01-2016, 12:53
bduddy bduddy is offline
Registered User
FRC #0840 (ART)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: San Bruno, CA
Posts: 869
bduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond reputebduddy has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Immobile 200+ pts solo robot concept

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyBare View Post
Then you'd be fouled for a G25
  • Sub-section B
coordinating a blockade of the FIELD with ALLIANCE members
An example of a blockade would be two (2) or more ROBOTS on the same ALLIANCE working together to “box” an opponent ROBOT into a corner of the FIELD using the GUARDRAIL and the CASTLE WALL.
How is this a blockade of the field? It doesn't inhibit the movement of the other alliance at all.
__________________

Does anyone else remember when TBA signatures actually worked?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:15.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi