|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Category A Crossing?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by GeeTwo : 01-12-2016 at 10:15 PM. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Category A Crossing?
Quote:
XD |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Category A Crossing?
Quote:
I believe it would be legal for you to hold the door for your teammates. Is this your interpretation as well? |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Category A Crossing?
As long as the robot doing the crossing does not touch the defense outside of the Outer Works, that should be legal.
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Category A Crossing?
Quote:
This particular Crossing method will only net you one Crossing, thus one "hit" to the Defense. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Category A Crossing?
Quote:
Personally I buy the argument that a mechanism could be created for both Category A defenses, I do not see, however, given the available expansion space and geometry of the Category A and C defenses how you could also open the Category C defenses without a second mechanism or some secondary actuation on the first mechanism. IMO, since Category A is the only set of defenses that cannot be defeated by robot that can only drive, so prioritize mechanisms for those defenses first and if you have the extra weight after you're done, add something for Category C, otherwise just work with your alliance partners. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Category A Crossing?
Quote:
Total apologies to our French FRC friends, just attempting some word association games....My last name? Lucier Yes, it is French. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Category A Crossing?
On a return trip I open Sally Port door, here move on in partner where you'll be safe, hold on I'll be right back...Do wait for me please (I return over another easy Defense, grab a boulder as I'm not going over empty handed), join you holding the door I opened for you from the neutral side, we proceed. Sally Port Damaged. Draw Bridge is next if it's there. While you wait for me you are safe...If not we'll pick up those penalty points later from them at match end.
|
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Category A Crossing?
Quote:
|
|
#26
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Category A Crossing?
In our game analysis we developed a match gameplan for three types of matches:
- Quals at district event (our robot and 2 minimally functional partners) - Elims case 1 (us and 2 pretty good partners) - Elims case 2 (us, 1 other excellent partner and one minimally functional partner) In all three of these gameplans, the first two actions are: 1) autonomous drive across an easy defense (score goal if technically possible) 2) open door/drawbridge for partners to drive through This ensures that seconds into teleop we will have a minimum of 20 points on the board and 3 of the 8 required defense crossings completed, even if our partners are only boxes on wheels that can just drive. |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Category A Crossing?
Category A
Pork Cutlet (portcullis) Cheese Fries (cheval de frise) Category B Root Beer Moat (moat) Jam Tarts (ramparts) Category C Salad Fork (sally port) Raw Cabbage (drawbridge) Category D Gumball (rock wall) Hunger Pang (rough terrain) Permanent Defense Steak Tartare (low bar) Last edited by Taylor : 01-13-2016 at 10:15 AM. |
|
#28
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Category A Crossing?
Surely this defense is Chicken Paillard. Or is that not an option cause it's still French? Or maybe Tostones. The Panini Press? Oh! George Foreman. That surely has to be the correct name.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|