|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Maximum bore/stroke length for cylinders?
You could use smaller bore cylinders if you added powerful constant force springs (free from Vulcan Spring).
For example, if you pre-loaded your lift with 40 or 50 lbs of force then you have to push the springs up when you're extending, but only have to pull 70-80 lbs when retracting. Of course you want to design in a fudge factor for safety. ![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Maximum bore/stroke length for cylinders?
Our Team tested this cylinder with ~120 in^3 of storage capacity lowering and lifting 135lbs. Here's a video link of the test:
https://youtu.be/M5YBYYYhEY0 We used the pneumatic system from last years robot to get an idea of the air flow and the load on the compressor. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Maximum bore/stroke length for cylinders?
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|