|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
Looking good. I liked the use of a larger wheel for a flywheel on the shooter.
How much compression did you stick on the shooter? |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
Have you tested that drive base on the moat? Our initial pre-built concept chassis had a similar wheel spacing and we just got caught up. We thought the rock wall would give use the biggest problem, but the spacing of the moat can cause the chassis to sit on the moat ends and have the wheels free spinning. The rock wall was no problem. The moat was deceptively challenging for us. Our new prototype robot will have the wheels closer. Hopefully, our new spacing will be perfect and we can use that spacing for building the next two robots (practice and competition).
Here's our video of this. Last edited by bEdhEd : 17-01-2016 at 05:37. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
This looks great! May I ask what amount of center drop you have on the drivetrain, , what diameter the Colson shooter wheel is, and how much you are gearing up the CIM?
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
Quote:
![]() <edit> Oops. Looks like Nate has no such compunctions... I will say that the prototype drivetrain is from our 2014 robot, and we plan for the 2016 drive rails to be of the same design as the 2015 drive rails. The CAD for these bots can be downloaded from FRCdesigns.com Last edited by ToddF : 17-01-2016 at 15:43. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
Quote:
For instance, hit the mote with a bit more authority and you may just own it. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
I tend to agree. This year, different from years past(specifically 2010), you need to launch yourself at a few of the defenses just to get over them.
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
We believe true authority is being able to traverse any defense at any speed, even at a crawl haha.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
That's one consistent (at from the video) shooter!
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
We're thinking about drown-down pads (or similar) to assist in stability and angle adjustment for high goal shots. Strategic placement could also mean they assist with getting stuck in the moat. Our prototyping drive base didn't get stuck unless it skewed far left/right, but that base was also 3" too long w.r.t. the current actual CAD design.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
Quote:
![]() |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
Awww. Here I was hoping "drown-drop pads" was something tackling the moat that was appropriately named
![]() I suggest using this name from now on ![]() |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2363 Triple Helix week one prototypes
We tested it right at the end of last night's meeting, with no added weight on the robot. I didn't take video, as I don't consider tests with just the drivetrain weight to be conclusive. That said, driving slowly we did get stuck, though not badly, and the driver was able to free the robot. With a little practice, and the right technique, the robot could traverse the moat every time. We'll see if these results are repeatable with full robot weight.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|