|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: What should be permitted as "COTS"? You may mark as many as you like. | |||
| Pre-cut metal with no moving parts, such as sprockets |
|
155 | 76.73% |
| Simple moving parts - such as bearings. |
|
157 | 77.72% |
| More complex moving pieces - such as gearboxes |
|
159 | 78.71% |
| Motorized components - such as the Dart Actuator |
|
134 | 66.34% |
| Basic Drive Train Kit - KOP Chassis |
|
152 | 75.25% |
| More Complex Drive Train Kits, such as the Rhino Drive. |
|
101 | 50.00% |
| Working Manipulators, such as AndyMark's Intake |
|
59 | 29.21% |
| Full Competitive Robot |
|
34 | 16.83% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 202. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: COTS: How far should it go?
I'm pretty disappointed y'all went ahead and spun the Chief Delphi Wheel of Absurdity without me, so I'm just going to do my thing:
-Mentors can only be on the drive team if they look like students -Students should design the robot and force the mentors to build it -My region sucks but it's better than your unorganized POS -FIRST HQ sucks except when they do stuff I like -Samsung Galaxy Nexus is a misunderstood phone -If your Chairman's submission includes the line "we don't build robots, we build people" you're a bad person -We're gonna build a wall around FIRST suppliers and make Mexico pay for it |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|