|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: What should be permitted as "COTS"? You may mark as many as you like. | |||
| Pre-cut metal with no moving parts, such as sprockets |
|
155 | 76.73% |
| Simple moving parts - such as bearings. |
|
157 | 77.72% |
| More complex moving pieces - such as gearboxes |
|
159 | 78.71% |
| Motorized components - such as the Dart Actuator |
|
134 | 66.34% |
| Basic Drive Train Kit - KOP Chassis |
|
152 | 75.25% |
| More Complex Drive Train Kits, such as the Rhino Drive. |
|
101 | 50.00% |
| Working Manipulators, such as AndyMark's Intake |
|
59 | 29.21% |
| Full Competitive Robot |
|
34 | 16.83% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 202. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: COTS: How far should it go?
Nobody is saying that we should lower the bar. Lowering the barrier to entry and "lowering the bar" are very different things. The bar is as high as each team sets it for themselves. The bar to win Einstein will always be high.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|