|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
I just read this Q&A:
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
To me the oil is there to only keep the seal lubricated. It doesn't seem like there is a lot of oil. Its only about an 1/8 of the way filled from what I can tell.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
Quote:
The way the question was worded, Quote:
I don't believe that is the intent of the GDC, I just believe that there is a lack of understanding of the construction of a gas spring. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
The Q&A people seem to be using really really strict interpretations of rules lately.
Another one is with the vouchers and only getting credit for the items you specifically ordered with the voucher. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
The brochure you link to appears to be an "artist's rendering" of what it really looks like inside a gas spring.
I think that the Q&A is talking about gas filled shock absorbers, and you are talking about gas springs. One has quite a bit of oil, and the oil is used for damping over the entire stroke, and the gas is used only to reduce aeration of the oil. The other has gas in it as the working medium, and oil is used only for lubrication. Some folks just ask too many questions! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
You're probably right, and thanks for bringing it up!
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
Thanks for the discussion. I am the poster of that Q to the Q&A. This is the product I was referencing:
http://www.mcmaster.com/#4138t58/=10vr03y Of course, when I bought them I didn't read the description thoroughly, because it seemed EVERYONE on CD said gas springs like those used in car hatchbacks were legal. Then I saw that that they had oil in them, and that the oil is listed in the description under "Force Mechanism". Which implies a hydraulic dampener for the gas spring. Essentially the oil is there to slow the restoring motion of the rod. Any refs out there? Have you told a team they are NOT going to pass inspection because they had this type of gas spring? |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
Quote:
![]() Personally, my team has used gas springs before, quite possibly the same ones you linked (another mentor obtained them, so I can't be sure, but they look the same to me!). I wasn't aware that there was any oil in them other than that needed for lubrication. I kind of want to get one now and cut it open to see how much is actually in there... Maybe we can get Al to chime in here! |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
I think that you'd be hard pressed to find someone on a team who has ever seen the oil in a gas spring! I think there is a warning on them about "DO NOT OPEN THIS", you know.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
Quote:
Also, I know many wood-turners that swear by home-made lathe tools made from the rods of gas springs. Extreme car must be taken when "venting" the high pressure gas. |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
Hmmm....my older SUV was built in 1957, they hadn't invented that yet!
But that's a good point, if you use your robot daily for ten years, you might leak a drop or two of oil. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
As a robot inspector, absent better guidance, I was accept something labeled as a gas spring as a gas spring. To me. the Macmaster Carr is a gas spring. As opposed to a mountain bike gas shock, which is also a gas spring, but the QA has ruled the oil shock part makes it illegal. A little strange because the rule specifically allows a gas shock. All the gas shocks I know of use oil as the energy absorption mechanism required for shock absorption. So before today I would have considered a mountain bike shock legal. Your inspector may vary.
Lets hope somebody makes this clearer. This kind of vagueness isn't fair for teams or inspectors. |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
I don't think they meant to outlaw gas springs like those from McMaster. Teams (including mine) have been using them for years to counter balance arms, or make passive mechanisms (after match climbs, etc).
I'm not sure why they would outlaw sealed gas shocks either, like those on mountain bikes, seems pretty hard to get the fluid out of those by accident but I guess in some cases I could see why they could be ruled illegal. They definitely need to clarify this. We have a couple places on our robot where we are considering gas springs, if we have to make some other linear spring mechanism it will be a lot more work. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Gas springs and Q&A #Q695
It seems that my question was not specific enough for the Q&A. I tried to avoid the response of 'we don't comment on robot designs'. Perhaps I should have included a link to the McMaster site.
From what I can see from the limited number of diagrams online, none for the SUSPA Gas Spring I bought or very helpful, the oil inside is just for lubrication, and not for mechanical advantage. I guess I'll either submit another Q or keep my fingers crossed. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|