Low Bar

[Boltman]

Originally Posted by AllenGregoryIV

True but a 2-3 ball auto is orders of magnitude harder than a defense of a 2-3 ball auto. Example, knocking the balls off the center line to anywhere but where the team that is doing the 2-3 ball auto wants them. A multi ball auto might help you capture the tower during quals but I'm not convinced that it secures a regional/championship win once teams can plan out defenses for it.

Teams cannot defend in Auto without reprogramming the spy bot and highly risk a foul impeding crossing. As for midline shenanigans that means that bot is not scoring either. Not likely I'm saying.

I really don't see the advantage to not Scoring in auto yourself and attempting to prevent team X from doing their multi ball auto the mid line rule and the not prevent crossing rule make that highly unlikely to succeed.

Plus the way defenses are laid out they are on opposite sides so main auto action is opposite.

I guess it could happen however that seems very unlikely. But who knows?

[AllenGregoryIV]

Originally Posted by Boltman

Teams cannot defend in Auto without reprogramming the spy bot and highly risk a foul impeding crossing. As for midline shenanigans that means that bot is not scoring either. Not likely I'm saying.

I really don't see the advantage to not Scoring in auto yourself and attempting to prevent team X from doing their multi ball auto the mid line rule and the not prevent crossing rule make that highly unlikely to succeed.

Plus the way defenses are laid out they are on opposite sides so main auto action is opposite.

I guess it could happen however that seems very unlikely. But who knows?

First, the spy bot is on your offensive side of the field and has nothing to do with defending multi ball autos. 2nd hitting two balls out of the way takes far less time then is needed to score in auto, they aren't mutually exclusive. A 1 or 2 ball lead on the tower coming out of auto is a huge advantage which is why high level teams will attempt that very hard challenge. If a team starts consistently making 2-3 auto balls it is clearly beneficial for an opposite alliance in eliminations to try to get to those balls first and prevent their opponents from scoring them. Wasn't it better for 1114 to try and defend 254's three ball auto in 2014 instead of scoring a high goal themselves.

[Boltman]

Originally Posted by AllenGregoryIV

First, the spy bot is on your offensive side of the field and has nothing to do with defending multi ball autos. 2nd hitting two balls out of the way takes far less time then is needed to score in auto, they aren't mutually exclusive. A 1 or 2 ball lead on the tower coming out of auto is a huge advantage which is why high level teams will attempt that very hard challenge. If a team starts consistently making 2-3 auto balls it is clearly beneficial for an opposite alliance in eliminations to try to get to those balls first and prevent their opponents from scoring them. Wasn't it better for 1114 to try and defend 254's three ball auto in 2014 instead of scoring a high goal themselves.

How are you planning on knocking balls in auto without crossing the mid-line and avoiding the high chance of a foul?

[AllenGregoryIV]

Originally Posted by Boltman

How are you planning on knocking balls in auto without crossing the mid-line and avoiding the high chance of a foul?

How are teams planning to collect balls without getting foul? It seems a lot easier to just hit a ball then it does to intake it. Pretty sure it can be done with a pneumatic cylinder and a couple sticks.

[Boltman]

Originally Posted by AllenGregoryIV

How are teams planning to collect balls without getting foul? It seems a lot easier to just hit a ball then it does to intake it. Pretty sure it can be done with a pneumatic cylinder and a couple sticks.

Perhaps I suspect intake to be easier.

[cadandcookies]

Originally Posted by Boltman

Perhaps I suspect intake to be easier.

Anything involving the center line involves a ridiculous amount of accuracy, so I suppose it may be possible that you're right. That being said, it's a general rule that screwing something up is significantly easier than doing it, and I see no reason to suspect that's not the case here.

[Abrakadabra]

Not sure how this thread about the Low Bar got sidetracked into a discussion about 2-ball auton, but here is my question:

How many teams have actually practiced going under the Low Bar WITH the cloth barrier in place? If you have, how would you say that it affects your ability to successfully cross the defense?

Also - it may have been stated elsewhere, but please note that the Team drawings of the field specify black iron pipe as the weight for the curtain, while the actual field will have an aluminum pipe - quite a difference in weight!

[zinthorne]

[quote=Abrakadabra;1532940]Not sure how this thread about the Low Bar got sidetracked into a discussion about 2-ball auton, but here is my question:

How many teams have actually practiced going under the Low Bar WITH the cloth barrier in place? If you have, how would you say that it affects your ability to successfully cross the defense?

We have tried it. You need to make sure you don't have anything on the top of your robot for it to get caught on. It's very easy to get snagged. And you should have some time of roll bars or something else that accomplishes protecting the top of your robot. The bar/fabric will catch on the inside of your robot easily.