|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Chain Tension-er?
We found that flexible sprocket device too and I was wondering if something like that could be 3D printed out of some material that would give a similar effect. Anyone have thoughts about this?
Also from my reading it seems like tensioning addresses at least two separate factors. The first is making the chain the correct length for the application. This can also be solved with careful design and manufacturing. The second is compensating for chain stretch. Which of these sounds like the bigger factor for an application like a drive train? |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Chain Tension-er?
I suspect if you could get it to print right with the proper spacing, ABS would have enough flex without being too squishy or too rigid. The trick is getting it right.
As far as spacing, the only actual problem is length, which chain stretch contributes to. The three options are 1. ignore it, 2. tension it, 3. have some way to move a sprocket around so you can move it back when chain stretch. |
|
#18
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Chain Tension-er?
I would laser cut this thing before I tried to 3D print them. But even that seems a bit sketchy to me. As I recall (I have only held one in my hand once and it was years ago), the reason the device is a hoop and not a disk is that the hoop structure allows it to become an ellipse and thereby add some springiness to the system. As slack becomes available the ellipse gets more round and takes up that slack.
Bottom line, this thing flexes. I think a 3D printed version is doomed to destroy itself over time. Dr. Joe J. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Chain Tension-er?
I highly recommend an idler pulley. My team has used a bolt with a piece of pvc around it. To attach the bolt, we tighten it with a lock nut through a slot on a piece of sheet metal. The one thing about this is that the nut has to be really tightened down. Otherwise it's about as light and simple as you can get.
We've also used spring loaded tensioners. These had their advantages and disadvantages. The big advantage was never needing to worry that the chain was tensioned after the tensioner was attached. The disadvantages are of course cost, but also weight. Additionally, support like a wood block must be added to the bolts used to attach the spring tensioners if they cannot be mounted directly onto a frame element. We have also used 3d printed pieces on a belt drive. They are a half moon shape sized to tension the belt without needing to be adjusted. Last edited by elil : 02-02-2016 at 20:01. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Chain Tension-er?
We've used this product from McMaster every year.
Expensive, but totally worth it. http://www.mcmaster.com/#chain-tensioners/=10yrv27 |
|
#21
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Chain Tension-er?
Quote:
Build your own. It's not that hard and it is totally worth it. ;-) Dr. Joe J. P.S. Serious. Designing chain tensioning into your robot is just a skill that FIRST teams should acquire and then nurture and grow. It is a core skill that makes your robot SO MUCH more reliable if you do it right. Learn it. Love it. Pass it on before you graduate. JJ |
|
#22
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Chain Tension-er?
Quote:
I don't have any photos of the 2011 drive train usage, but I do have one available from when I first used them in 2009. We used the same style polycarbonate floating idlers in 2011. ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|