|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Is the low bar worth it or not? | |||
| yes |
|
256 | 78.29% |
| no |
|
71 | 21.71% |
| Voters: 327. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low bar or not
Quote:
![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low bar or not
We're right there with you.
We pushed to 15". Slowing down a bit to go under is our tradeoff for the extra critical 0.5" of height for a certain mechanism. On the plus side, the portcullis doesn't have to be raised that far ![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Low bar or not
Yuuuup. We're a bunch of madmen also. The 2016 robot will certainly be our most dense robot ever.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low bar or not
We are currently at 13". No climber yet, but we will see.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Low bar or not
we finally got the robot mostly working today...and tried it on the low bar. It fit.
https://youtu.be/8ZeExbmZBVA . |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low bar or not
Yup, lots of nuts in the nuthouse. We are definitely nuts. Another camera angle...
Low robots force discipline. You are either going to have a rats nest which is unreliable or a very tight robot which can survive. This is going to be a rough game. Sadly, no printed robot for 3824 this year... Cracked the frame week 1. If this is a fast game, loads on structural members will be the highest we've ever experienced. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low bar or not
We have figured out the low bar and Groups A,B and D and have a shooter that can go high or low. Still working out and working on our climber concepts but that was the lowest our list of to dos .
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|