|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Snow blower motor backpedaling?
Thanks for the quick reply.
I don't know what is the ratio of gear is, but I would assume that it would be between 20:1 and 30:1. What would be a reasonable ratio that would prevent back driving? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Snow blower motor backpedaling?
We tried direct driving 2 snow blower motors for our extension arm as well, unfortunately we had the same issue. The motor was very under powered and didn't lift the arm well and when it did the motion was very quick, not quite controllable. We eventually scrapped the idea of using these motors and are now using a single CIM motor with a gearbox articulate.
Our arm was a box of 1in-1in 80-20 extrusion about 16 inches long and 14 inches wide, If you are sticking with the snow blowers make sure the arm is pretty light maybe box extrusion or even PVC. http://team-paragon.org/wp-content/u...Motors-571.pdf This link has a list of motors and power ratings, the snow blowers are one of the weaker ones on the chart Last edited by klhutchi : 09-02-2016 at 22:14. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Snow blower motor backpedaling?
Worm gear drives aren't magic. They don't prevent back driving other than to the extent that they create friction. The worm gear drives that do not backdrive are actually just remarkably inefficient reductions.
The motors that come with integral worm gearboxes are some of the lowest power options available to teams. Hanging and holding arms in the air takes a lot of power. Consider other options. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Snow blower motor backpedaling?
Thanks for the replies. I appreciate it
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|