|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Are you doing the low bar? If so, what will you do with it? | |||
| No low bar |
|
60 | 12.85% |
| Yes low bar, capable of B/D defenses with no shooter |
|
19 | 4.07% |
| Yes low bar, capable of B/D defenses with a shooter |
|
92 | 19.70% |
| Yes low bar, breach capable with no shooter |
|
56 | 11.99% |
| Yes low bar, breach capable with a shooter |
|
227 | 48.61% |
| Yes low bar, no B/D defenses with a shooter |
|
6 | 1.28% |
| Other |
|
7 | 1.50% |
| Voters: 467. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2
Do you think that those teams that misjudge how strong they will be relative to the field at their designed tasks will become defense robots?
If you look at the geometry, I believe a 54 inch moving wall will be able to block basically any shooter sitting near to the ground in the safe zone, and because of the small size of the goal this year teams being molested outside the safe zone by even a weak drive train probably have a low chance of hitting the high goal. Added to that is, if a defense robot forces a low shooter to shoot into the low goal (2 points versus 5 points) they take away any advantage the added accessibility of the courtyard via the low bar adds in the first place. Last edited by Keefe2471 : 10-02-2016 at 19:05. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|