Go to Post You're not on your own, use your team members. They are the most valuable source of ideas that you have. - fr05ty27355 [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Are you doing the low bar? If so, what will you do with it?
No low bar 60 12.85%
Yes low bar, capable of B/D defenses with no shooter 19 4.07%
Yes low bar, capable of B/D defenses with a shooter 92 19.70%
Yes low bar, breach capable with no shooter 56 11.99%
Yes low bar, breach capable with a shooter 227 48.61%
Yes low bar, no B/D defenses with a shooter 6 1.28%
Other 7 1.50%
Voters: 467. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 13:18
NShep98's Avatar
NShep98 NShep98 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Nathan Shepherd
FRC #2079 (4H ALARM Robotics)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Franklin, MA
Posts: 237
NShep98 is a glorious beacon of lightNShep98 is a glorious beacon of lightNShep98 is a glorious beacon of lightNShep98 is a glorious beacon of lightNShep98 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keefe2471 View Post
I'm sorry if I come off as rude, but I think that dismissing this poll (or any poll on this website) on the assumption that most of the 300 people who have already responded to this poll are on far better than average teams does not seem to do anything except cheapen the discussion.

Thoughts?
I agree completely. CD isn't some elite group where only the best teams are allowed in. You don't even need to be on a team to make an account. It is true that poll results are not necessarily a great representation of all FIRST teams, but simply being a Chief Delphi poll does not make us better.

Even so, the polls say a large amount of teams are planning on the low bar, and even if it turns out to only be half that number in reality, as I like to say, "half of a lot still tends to be a lot".

All this low bar talk is starting to get repetitive, but that just goes to show how big of a deal it may turn out to be.
Reply With Quote
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 13:37
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,682
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2

What if the Transformers pick the Decepticons at Champs and need a specific type of robot for the 2nd pick?

Meh. First we have to earn the spot to Champs, and that means we need to be prepared to play the game locally - however that works. I know my team, in choosing the low bar and shooter, refused to give up the basic functions of a great low goal and great intake. It was an easy decision since our targets for breaching we solved very early on. So in playing the long game (yay districts!) we know we have until District Champs to get the shooter to its highest level of play. Since we have the resources to do so, I think we'll get there.

Then we'll have to figure out the whole paradox implied by the first sentence above...
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub
Reply With Quote
  #33   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 13:50
PayneTrain's Avatar
PayneTrain PayneTrain is offline
Trickle-Down CMP Allocation
AKA: Lizard King
FRC #0422 (The Meme Tech Pneumatic Devices)
Team Role: Mascot
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: RVA
Posts: 2,254
PayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
What if the Transformers pick the Decepticons at Champs and need a specific type of robot for the 2nd pick?

Meh. First we have to earn the spot to Champs, and that means we need to be prepared to play the game locally - however that works. I know my team, in choosing the low bar and shooter, refused to give up the basic functions of a great low goal and great intake. It was an easy decision since our targets for breaching we solved very early on. So in playing the long game (yay districts!) we know we have until District Champs to get the shooter to its highest level of play. Since we have the resources to do so, I think we'll get there.

Then we'll have to figure out the whole paradox implied by the first sentence above...
Teams that have been preparing to take full advantage of the district schedule can be very successful but also will have very interesting types of performances. The robot we need to do well at our first event is somewhat unrecognizable compared to the robot we need to succeed at district champs. In theory we could wholesale replace our robot and then some across the 5 different competitions (if we actually do that, I might die).

Also while saying that Chief Delphi users are not representative of FIRST as a whole is not entirely a logical fallacy, a claim that they are always going to be stronger performers does have holes in it. Source.
Reply With Quote
  #34   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 14:34
Drakxii Drakxii is offline
Registered User
FRC #4131 (Iron Patriots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 120
Drakxii is just really niceDrakxii is just really niceDrakxii is just really niceDrakxii is just really niceDrakxii is just really nice
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2

Sorry I should have explained myself better but I am not trying to say that Chief Dehlpi teams are always better then others. I just get tired of the implications that 70-90% of the teams that selected "Yes low bar, breach capable with a shooter" are going to awful or useless.
__________________
Michael D.
Favorite game: Aerial Assist
Least Favorite: Recycle Rush

Pantherbots Mentor - #2582 Lufkin, TX
* Lone Star Regional 2016, 2015 - 3rd place (Semifinals), 2014 - Quarterfinals, 2013 - Quarterfinals (Judges Award)

Iron Patriots Mentor - #4131 Renton, WA
PNW Ranking: 2016 - 18
* Auburn Mountain View District Event 2016 - Semifinals (EE Award)
* Auburn District Event 2016 - Finalists (ID Award)
* PNW Champs 2016 - Quarterfinals
* World Champs 2016 - Carson
Reply With Quote
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 14:43
Caleb Sykes's Avatar
Caleb Sykes Caleb Sykes is offline
Registered User
FRC #4536 (MinuteBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 1,057
Caleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2

For anyone interested, I have started another thread here which will help us to gauge how representative CD polls are of FRC teams as a whole.
Reply With Quote
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 14:51
OccamzRazor's Avatar
OccamzRazor OccamzRazor is offline
Go YETI!
AKA: Robbie
FRC #3506 (YETI)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 169
OccamzRazor is a splendid one to beholdOccamzRazor is a splendid one to beholdOccamzRazor is a splendid one to beholdOccamzRazor is a splendid one to beholdOccamzRazor is a splendid one to beholdOccamzRazor is a splendid one to behold
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by sagi34 View Post
I dont agree about this, I think that this year scouting is gonna be realy fun, scouting nightmare was 2013 mission, was hard to follow all the discs that were flying around the field.
Totally agree with the scoring aspect being very easy to scout but thinking about all those low bar robots and how many field elements they need to interact with will make for a very interesting year since you will have to look for the robots that differentiate themselves from the sea of Dozer sized low bar robots. There are just so many things to look at when considering an alliance partner and I feel that it will be a challenge especially for new teams.
__________________
2015 NC Regional Chairman's Award
2016 NC Guilford District Event Winner
2016 NC Guilford District Chairman's Award
2016 NC District Championship Winner
2016 NC Regional Chairman's Award
2016 NC Woodie Flowers Award Finalist - Lia Schwinghammer



Reply With Quote
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 15:38
MrForbes's Avatar
MrForbes MrForbes is offline
Registered User
AKA: Jim
FRC #1726 (N.E.R.D.S.)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Sierra Vista AZ
Posts: 6,008
MrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond reputeMrForbes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2

In addition to the complexities of scouting, I can imagine that coaching is going to be challenging. Figuring out how to deal with all the defenses with each alliance's capabilities, coordinating when who goes where and which robot pushes which other robot through and who opens the door for whom when...plus the fun of getting everyone on the batter when it's time to challenge....
Reply With Quote
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 16:14
XenObliv's Avatar
XenObliv XenObliv is offline
Registered User
AKA: Phillip Parker
FRC #1902 (Exploding Bacon)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 25
XenObliv is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2

I originally thought that Karthik's reasoning for being terrified was simply because there are teams that would give up "playing" the game for going under the low bar. What I mean by this is teams that would give up shooting high, scoring the boulder or climbing the castle for going under the low bar, being that it is a easy objective. But this poll seems to reflect that teams are going to attempt to do it all. Personally I think this perspective is beneficial to the FIRST community, making competition more competitive, and it allows the students to overcome the large problem of engineering a robot that can do it all. Disclaimer, if fifty percent of robots will be able to travel under the low bar then the low bar will be a highly contested team strategy. I think due to the format of the game most teams will not be able to travel through the defenses as fast as they can travel under the low bar. The best teams in the world will be able to do all the defenses as fast as they can traverse the low bar. Currently I believe the reasoning for Karthik being terrified is due to strategy, we need to ask ourselves, did Simbotics or OP Robotics build a robot around a strategy, such as a Low Bar cycle shooter (Only traveling through the Low Bar). While I think this specific strategy example is starkly unlikely for either Simbotics or OP Robotics use, I do think that Karthik is scared due to a mistake (shocking to think this is possible of either team). Stronghold will be exciting to watch.
Reply With Quote
  #39   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 16:29
waialua359's Avatar
waialua359 waialua359 is online now
Mentor
AKA: Glenn
FRC #0359 (Hawaiian Kids)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Waialua, HI
Posts: 3,301
waialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2

I can tell you what's really tough.
Wiring your robot with all of your control system parts in a tiny package footprint for trying to achieve a low bar passage, lift and traversing the barriers.


Here's what nobody is talking about.
What would an elite team really do?

My guess is that they focus on a superior articulating frame that traverses the defenses effortlessly, keeping a relatively high robot, doing all of the above with excellence.
Why?
Because they can easily choose a 2nd and/or 3rd partner that focuses solely on the low bar and the fact that there will be lots of them.

The biggest hint was on the poll that asked if teams were affected by the change in dimensions to one of the barriers.
Only the elite chose that they were screwed.
__________________

2016 Hawaii Regional #1 seed, IDesign, Safety Award
2016 NY Tech Valley Regional Champions, #1 seed, Innovation in Controls Award
2016 Lake Superior Regional Champions, #1 seed, Quality Award, Dean's List
2015 FRC Worlds-Carver Division Champions
2015 Hawaii Regional Champions, #1 seed.
2015 Australia Regional Champions, #2 seed, Engineering Excellence Award
2015 Inland Empire Regional Champions, #1 seed, Industrial Design Award
2014 OZARK Mountain Brawl Champions, #1 seed.
2014 Hawaii Regional Champions, #1 seed, UL Safety Award
2014 Dallas Regional Champions, #1 seed, Engineering Excellence Award
2014 Northern Lights Regional Champions, #1 seed, Entrepreneurship Award
2013 Championship Dean's List Winner
2013 Utah Regional Champion, #1 seed, KP&B Award, Deans List
2013 Boilermaker Regional Champion, #1 seed, Motorola Quality Award
2012 Lone Star Regional Champion, #1 seed, Motorola Quality Award
2012 Hawaii Regional Champions #1 seed, Motorola Quality Award
Reply With Quote
  #40   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 16:41
XenObliv's Avatar
XenObliv XenObliv is offline
Registered User
AKA: Phillip Parker
FRC #1902 (Exploding Bacon)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 25
XenObliv is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by waialua359 View Post
I can tell you what's really tough.
Wiring your robot with all of your control system parts in a tiny package footprint for trying to achieve a low bar passage, lift and traversing the barriers.


Here's what nobody is talking about.
What would an elite team really do?

My guess is that they focus on a superior articulating frame that traverses the defenses effortlessly, keeping a relatively high robot, doing all of the above with excellence.
Why?
Because they can easily choose a 2nd and/or 3rd partner that focuses solely on the low bar and the fact that there will be lots of them.

The biggest hint was on the poll that asked if teams were affected by the change in dimensions to one of the barriers.
Only the elite chose that they were screwed.
For the GREAT Low Bar Robots it should be inefficient to go across the field to the low bar.
Reply With Quote
  #41   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 16:47
waialua359's Avatar
waialua359 waialua359 is online now
Mentor
AKA: Glenn
FRC #0359 (Hawaiian Kids)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Waialua, HI
Posts: 3,301
waialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond reputewaialua359 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by XenObliv View Post
For the GREAT Low Bar Robots it should be inefficient to go across the field to the low bar.
For the great.....yes.
But for the rest, it depends just how effective they traverse those barriers.
And we will see a lot struggle with it...
__________________

2016 Hawaii Regional #1 seed, IDesign, Safety Award
2016 NY Tech Valley Regional Champions, #1 seed, Innovation in Controls Award
2016 Lake Superior Regional Champions, #1 seed, Quality Award, Dean's List
2015 FRC Worlds-Carver Division Champions
2015 Hawaii Regional Champions, #1 seed.
2015 Australia Regional Champions, #2 seed, Engineering Excellence Award
2015 Inland Empire Regional Champions, #1 seed, Industrial Design Award
2014 OZARK Mountain Brawl Champions, #1 seed.
2014 Hawaii Regional Champions, #1 seed, UL Safety Award
2014 Dallas Regional Champions, #1 seed, Engineering Excellence Award
2014 Northern Lights Regional Champions, #1 seed, Entrepreneurship Award
2013 Championship Dean's List Winner
2013 Utah Regional Champion, #1 seed, KP&B Award, Deans List
2013 Boilermaker Regional Champion, #1 seed, Motorola Quality Award
2012 Lone Star Regional Champion, #1 seed, Motorola Quality Award
2012 Hawaii Regional Champions #1 seed, Motorola Quality Award
Reply With Quote
  #42   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 16:49
RoboChair's Avatar
RoboChair RoboChair is offline
He who fixes with hammers #tsimfd
AKA: Devin Castellucci
FRC #1678 (Citrus Circuits and 5458 Digital Minds)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 641
RoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drakxii View Post
Do remember this is a poll of Chief Dehlpi teams. This is not a clean slice of the general FRC population. Rather this is a highly skewed sample of teams who's BBQ is far greater then the standard FRC population.
On the other hand it could just be multiple members from the same team voting that has skewed the results the way they are. Most highly successful teams have much larger student and mentor populations, if they are all voting it will skew the results towards the crazier of robot designs.

If we assume that a fixed percentage of all FRC students and mentors are active on CD, having a larger team will disproportionately give them more votes.
__________________

11 Years and counting! Over a third of my life has been spent with FRC.
Reply With Quote
  #43   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 17:39
Sperkowsky's Avatar
Sperkowsky Sperkowsky is offline
Professional Multitasker
AKA: Samuel Perkowsky
FRC #2869 (Regal Eagles)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Bethpage, NY
Posts: 1,904
Sperkowsky has a reputation beyond reputeSperkowsky has a reputation beyond reputeSperkowsky has a reputation beyond reputeSperkowsky has a reputation beyond reputeSperkowsky has a reputation beyond reputeSperkowsky has a reputation beyond reputeSperkowsky has a reputation beyond reputeSperkowsky has a reputation beyond reputeSperkowsky has a reputation beyond reputeSperkowsky has a reputation beyond reputeSperkowsky has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK View Post
What if the Transformers pick the Decepticons at Champs and need a specific type of robot for the 2nd pick?

Meh. First we have to earn the spot to Champs, and that means we need to be prepared to play the game locally - however that works. I know my team, in choosing the low bar and shooter, refused to give up the basic functions of a great low goal and great intake. It was an easy decision since our targets for breaching we solved very early on. So in playing the long game (yay districts!) we know we have until District Champs to get the shooter to its highest level of play. Since we have the resources to do so, I think we'll get there.

Then we'll have to figure out the whole paradox implied by the first sentence above...
Well our robot is named after an Autobot so I guess we gave to be on the other alliance.
Reply With Quote
  #44   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 17:51
sagi34 sagi34 is offline
Registered User
FRC #2231 (OnyxTronix)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Israel
Posts: 31
sagi34 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by OccamzRazor View Post
Totally agree with the scoring aspect being very easy to scout but thinking about all those low bar robots and how many field elements they need to interact with will make for a very interesting year since you will have to look for the robots that differentiate themselves from the sea of Dozer sized low bar robots. There are just so many things to look at when considering an alliance partner and I feel that it will be a challenge especially for new teams.
yes, it will be a challenge and this is the fun part
much better than 2015, and even better than 2014 in my opinion, I like games that require good scouting and strategy.
__________________
Student: 2013 - 2015
Mentor since 2016
Reply With Quote
  #45   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-02-2016, 18:28
maxnz's Avatar
maxnz maxnz is offline
Registered User
AKA: Max Narvaez
FRC #2855 (BEASTBot)
Team Role: Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Rookie Year: 2016
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 253
maxnz is a glorious beacon of lightmaxnz is a glorious beacon of lightmaxnz is a glorious beacon of lightmaxnz is a glorious beacon of lightmaxnz is a glorious beacon of lightmaxnz is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Low Bar Poll, part 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by waialua359 View Post
Wiring your robot with all of your control system parts in a tiny package footprint for trying to achieve a low bar passage, lift and traversing the barriers.
This is the problem that I am currently solving for my team. Three clear 'shelves' so we can see everything but still fit it in a small 7" by 10" by 6" high space.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi