|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Reversable Bumpers Illegal?
While this was expected, it still makes me happy
![]() |
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Reversable Bumpers Illegal?
Sweet. That makes two team updates I've made it into this year.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Reversable Bumpers Illegal?
You're not kidding. Me too.
Also, thank you @Kevin. |
|
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Reversable Bumpers Illegal?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#20
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Reversable Bumpers Illegal?
Gary, Better to find out about disallowed strategies through team updates than through failing inspection, fouls, technical fouls, yellow cards, and red cards!
|
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Reversable Bumpers Illegal?
Quote:
Then it was used. That's when the Team Update was issued. The backstory: Back in '07, you got points for having robots entirely supported by other robots. The rules (initially) didn't specify that robots couldn't start stacked on each other. When Wildstang (and Raul) found themselves with two barely-mobile partners, the alliance agreed to stack the partners during match setup and then E-stop the pair of them, while Wildstang scored what they could. Worked perfectly... then the next Tuesday, the Team Update declared that strategy illegal. |
|
#22
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Reversable Bumpers Illegal?
There's also been cases of other rule updates that pop up after the Week 0 shakedown event(s) and even after Week 1 official events. Teams come up with ways to circumvent rules, or even break the game, that the GDC didn't consider before. This is no reflection on the GDC. 40000 young minds come up with strategies that a handful of game designers missed.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|