|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
My first thought is a football stadium and a radar or ultrasonic speed gun. The procedure is pretty obvious.
If you don't have a speed gun, a strobe of some sort, including the video method suggested by Ether would be next. As for 3946, we did the air-resistance-free calculation, added about 50%, tested that we had more than we needed to hit the goal at the ranges we wanted, then we'll back down based on empirical launch data until we hit the goal at the desired range (this year, with our rear bumper in the outer works). Not as elegant as the full-physics solution, but we've built several high-percentage launchers using this paradigm. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Ether
What coeficient of drag are you using for the ball in the 2014 spreadsheet? In 2017 the ball has a Cd in the 0.6 to 0.8 range by looking at wiffle ball data which varies with the Reyonds number. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
does anyone now the terminal velocity of the fuel?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
The terminal velocity can be calculated from the peak height and the gravity constant.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
From a known height of 3 meters the calculation follows a freefall model (Vy=0 @t=0) which uses Vy=gt and Y=0.5gt^2.
Thus t=sqrt(3m/9.8m/sec^2/0.5sec)=0.78 seconds. Vy terminal=0.78sec*9.8m/sec^2=7.66m/sec The Newtonian trajectory equations do use the initial velocity Voy as follows: Vy=Voy-gt Y=Voyt-0.5gt^2 @ Vy=0 the arc is at its peak X=Voht Voy=Vo*sin(launch angle from horizon) Vox=Vo*cos(launch angle) |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Newtonian model equations ignore drag which calculates a velocity only on the basis of gravity. My answer is only valid for a drag free Newtonian calculation. Terminal velocity with drag provide an upper velocity limit for a falling object. For a falling baseball it would be about 33m/sec (~108ft/sec) while a hail stone is ~14m/sec (45ft/sec). A 3 meter drop reaches a peak velocity of 7.66m/sec (~26ft/sec) which is less than the maximum terminal velocity. of either of the above examples.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminal_velocity Please read it. You are using a different definition. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
Quote:
Perhaps what you meant is constant acceleration model equations ignore air drag. |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: paper: Parabolic Trajectory Calculations
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|