|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
ONLY TWO plus 3481 so far to join the Low-Bar Challenged Support Group?!
Wow. --Michael Blake |
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
A functional robot is a strategic advantage.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
_YES_, Adam. And that includes making sure ALL the breakers are put back in.
Maybe that'll make a difference for us this season... --Michael Blake |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
Quote:
--Michael Blake |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
Cheezy won't be, but maybe the Canadians will...
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
I've always thought we make NICE bumpers...
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kt6ndemocv...rrent.JPG?dl=0 2016 KNIGHTmare. --Michael Blake |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
You're from that neck of the woods I guess, but based on the first low bar poll you might be wrong. (http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/po...ts&pollid=2577) You can look at the people that answered one way or another by following that link. (3 different 254 contributors voted saying they were not going under the low bar). But you're right down the road from them... Hmmmm.
That said, I think that people have underestimated the value of an unblock-able and accurate shooter from the outer works. Obviously the shooter has to be accurate, but assuming your source boulders is the neutral zone or your secret passage, you can negate almost half the area (the entire enemy courtyard) where effective interference defense can be played. I think if most boulder runners shoot anywhere besides the outerworks safe zone or are blockable while inside that safe zone by a 54" nearby, defense will be a game changer in the elims. Even just a drivetain moving around in the enemy courtyard between the batter and the next boulder would have slowed down almost every robot I've seen video of from this weekend. So 254 is probably (?) a member of the support group. Which just might be less of a support group and more of an exclusive club than most people realize. Haha. Anyways, I would love to see people talk about how this analysis is flawed and what you think is a much more likely meta to emerge as more and more information comes out. Last edited by Keefe2471 : 22-02-2016 at 18:26. Reason: Capitalization |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
I really don't think top tier teams will be low bar robots. They'll focus much more on being able to solo damage the other defenses (including class C), as well as having the fastest and most accurate high goal cycles/climbs as possible.
|
|
#25
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
Quote:
![]() |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
Awesome.. lol
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
We are in this category, hopefully it pays off!
|
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
2502 is joining the club
|
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
Quote:
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Low-Bar Challenged Robots - Support Group
Quote:
--Michael Blake |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|