|
I feel that everyone on the team that has contributed a large portion to the program should go. Any leftover money should go for next years payments. We had about 25+ members and only 20 could go. Of those 20 they had to have signed up and paid by a designated time and at least done something in the program. The day before we leave, 2 members drop leaving 2 open positions that are too late to be filled. What I don't support is that if they just want newer tech stuff and will sacrifice members for it, that's not right. Moneywise, we were lucky to get a really big grant which we probably won't get next year but we'll have better fundraising practices. Our school is happy with the team's preformance and they will definitely support us next year.
__________________
Sacramento Regional 2003 -Rookie All-Star Award
Silicon Valley Regional 2003 -Rookie All-Star Award
Sacramento Regional 2004 -Autodesk Visualization Award
Sacramento Regional 2004 -Regional Engineering Inspiration Award
Silicon Valley Regional 2004 -Johnson & Johnson Sportsmanship Award
Cal Games 2004 - Finalist (thank you 968 and 114!)
Sacramento Regional 2005 - #1 Seed Team Regional Finalist (with 254 and 114)
Sacramento Regional 2005 - Johnson and Johnson Team Sportsmanship Award
|
Engineering rules of thumb don't form the garbage that goes into the making of the robot. They take the garbage of the real world and turn it into more pure, if slightly diluted, data. - DampRobot [more] 
02-04-2003, 00:01
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode