|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
We had the same problem last year,and switched to the Navx this year. We have no problems with drift at all.
|
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Better gyroscope?
I went into last year a skeptic and I came out a believer: the NavMXP is going on every FIRST robot from now on until something better comes along (and I suppose that will be a long time, if ever because honestly, 1-2 degrees during a match is pretty much as good as you'll need for almost any algorithm I'm likely to use).
It just works. Very impressive performance. Dr. Joe J. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Better gyroscope?
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Better gyroscope?
Quote:
It is a great chip but it isn't the most user friendly. $99 for a FIRST friendly wrapper is a bargain (imho), especially because some of that $99 was probably going to be spent on an MXP IO expansion board for your RoboRIO anyway. Dr. Joe J. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Better gyroscope?
We had a lot of inconsistent behavior (unacceptably high drift, sudden rapid changes in angle) from the one you show in the picture, and went to the ITG-3200 gyro/accel available on Andymark this year.
Programming a custom interface took some effort, but so far we have had great results. Drift is less than 1 degree during a match and we can get a reliable calibration much faster. We have it integrating the rotation rate in a separate thread, and then we query it once per driverstation cycle to get the angle. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|