|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Rules violations spotted on webcasts
I've been hopping between a few feeds today and I'm seeing quite a few violations on the field...
Be careful out there teams, and notify your alliance partners if you see a violation, even if they get away with it. This is not a request for tattling, but more of a GP request to make sure the playing field is fair and safe. Future alliance partners will thank you. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Rules violations spotted on webcasts
To add to the list, I saw several instances of:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rules violations spotted on webcasts
Well, technically, you can exit their courtyard to their secret passage, but your point is taken.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Rules violations spotted on webcasts
GDC should've yellow striped the secret passage border that's not courtyard adjacent, then called it the SECRET ENTRANCE. Then that rule would've been much easier to understand.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rules violations spotted on webcasts
At least one tower capture that was credited even though at least one robot was not able to stay on the batter at the conclusion of the match (couldn't quite see if another one that rolled back managed to hang on the lip). Saw many credits for a challenge that way as well.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rules violations spotted on webcasts
Were their bumper numbers outlined in white? This would be allowed per rule R28-A.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rules violations spotted on webcasts
Maybe? The numbers may have been clear enough in person to satisfy the rules, but they were hard to read know the webcast.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rules violations spotted on webcasts
I would have a hard time believing they would be able to pass inspection if they weren't outlined. Additionally, the refs should be able to spot a violation and report it to the LRI to have the issue taken care of.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rules violations spotted on webcasts
Quote:
Mulling over internally how I feel about that and would like to know what the information that led to the deliberation was in regards to changing it after the fact. Was it initiated entirely by the ref crew via notes of talking the match over later? Last edited by scca229 : 05-03-2016 at 09:29. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rules violations spotted on webcasts
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rules violations spotted on webcasts
Wasn't on a webcast but I witnessed a robot running a pair of linear actuators with illegal motors all day today.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rules violations spotted on webcasts
how do you know they were illegal?
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rules violations spotted on webcasts
They openly told me the motors came with the actators, they were not dart actuators, and they were clearly not an frc approved motor
EDIT: See related picture - http://i.imgur.com/5Rod9e6.jpg On a related note, the climber the actuators were attached to gave the alliance the 10 points they needed to win the final match of the event. Last edited by cbale2000 : 05-03-2016 at 19:44. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rules violations spotted on webcasts
That's unfortunate. The inspectors should have caught that.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rules violations spotted on webcasts
I watched a cast where I couldn't tell if it was me being fatigued, or if the spy was actually wearing gloves which emitted light.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|