|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#61
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
Red bumper fabric. Much stronger then the fabric originally provided by FIRST.
|
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
Are you saying that the lowest point of the crossbar is lower than the official field drawing specs now?
|
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
Quote:
|
|
#64
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
I don't see it changing the game too much. It is going to be difficult to get a boulder across the entire field and into the courtyard especially with the bump around the secret passage.
|
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
Any team that has done their due-diligence will know with any human player worth their money, it is already possible - and legal - to get a boulder into the opponents courtyard.
|
|
#66
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
The lower pipe has always been in the official drawing specs. It's a pipe that was inserted into the cordura fabric mostly to keep boulders from rolling all the way from the secret passage to the courtyard.
|
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
It might not be 100% safe, but you could station a field reset person with a paddle with a long handle to deflect balls from going through the low goal when a bot is not near.
|
|
#68
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
How bad would it be to put the low bar in a different spot? If it was not directly in front of the secret passage boulders rolling under would not be an issue.
|
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
Autonomous programs may assume the position of the low bar.
|
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
Removing the fabric is a minor change that's not a big deal. Changing the positions of the defenses is a major change that would be a big deal if it happened.
|
|
#71
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
Thank you for the clarification of which bar was being referred to.
|
|
#72
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
My team, and i imagine many others, would absolutely have pursued a different design if the low bar was anywhere else. Changing this would have big strategic implications and be unacceptable to many teams.
|
|
#73
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
Here in Duluth, both Lake Superior and Northern Lights have been running pretty much all day yesterday and today with flaps made from bumper material (1000D cordura), and we haven't lost one of them. The flaps the field came with, at least on the LSR side, both got ripped in half by the third match yesterday.
|
|
#74
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
Standish- Sterling event in Michigan has removed the low bar material. Im not sure if anybody has mentioned that yet.
Last edited by Type : 03-05-2016 at 05:00 PM. Reason: Wrong Italics |
|
#75
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Removal of Low Bar Fabric
At Granite State, we destroyed (ripped clean through) one low bar, so we covered it in gaffers tape and replaced it with our one spare (used on the practice field). That one has a few holes too which is also gaffed over. GSD teams, if you're reading this, please don't rip our low bars
![]() We may attempt to sew the bumper fabric over the existing materials tomorrow. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|