|
|
|
 Don'tcha love technology? :p - Cory [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Galileo Division: What is your team position on collusion? | |||
| We support it, we plan to do it |
  
|
3 | 6.12% |
| We support it, but do not plan to do it |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| We do not support it, and do not plan to do it |
  
|
45 | 91.84% |
| We do not support it, but might do it anyway |
  
|
1 | 2.04% |
| Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
For the record:
- I do not believe in collusion in this years game. - I will not participate in collusion. - the Buzz team does not support collusion. - the Buzz team will not participate in collusion We believe the game was designed to be a true competition between the two alliances. Otherwise they would not have described it as two alliances competing against each other in a match. If they wanted collusion, they would have refered to all four teams on the field as an alliance.  |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Galileo teams | Andy Baker | Championship Event | 34 | 06-04-2003 20:52 |
| Hits, Misses, & Suggestions -- long message | archiver | 2000 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |
| The Case For 'Regionalizing' teams at the Nationals. | archiver | 2000 | 33 | 23-06-2002 23:35 |
| How do we view more teams? | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 23:11 |
| Multiple Regionals | archiver | 1999 | 55 | 23-06-2002 22:26 |
Hybrid Mode
