|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Galileo Division: What is your team position on collusion? | |||
| We support it, we plan to do it |
|
3 | 6.12% |
| We support it, but do not plan to do it |
|
0 | 0% |
| We do not support it, and do not plan to do it |
|
45 | 91.84% |
| We do not support it, but might do it anyway |
|
1 | 2.04% |
| Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
*Note: This is only my opinion and not necessarily's 384's opinion*
I think collusion is a good idea from the stand-point of strategy, but not a good idea morally. People will hate me, but think of this, what if this years game is beyond just a 2 vs 2 match but a game where the 4 must work together to create a bigger score. I also think that this 'collusion is bad and we must kill it' idea is going to kill yourself. Your going to find that instead of having fun and enjoying the competition, you find yourself running around trying to enforce this idea. Have fun. If you don't support the idea, then fine. Don't do it. For the teams who do it, then let them. When they get to the finals then they will fall since they won't be able to collude. *Note: This is my opinion and not necessarily's 384's opinion* |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Galileo teams | Andy Baker | Championship Event | 34 | 06-04-2003 20:52 |
| Hits, Misses, & Suggestions -- long message | archiver | 2000 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |
| The Case For 'Regionalizing' teams at the Nationals. | archiver | 2000 | 33 | 23-06-2002 23:35 |
| How do we view more teams? | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 23:11 |
| Multiple Regionals | archiver | 1999 | 55 | 23-06-2002 22:26 |