Go to Post Let's not fight, please. Discuss yes, fight no. Please. :) - JaneYoung [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Type of scouting
Qualitative above Quantitative 13 23.21%
Equal weight 21 37.50%
Quantitative above Qualitative 22 39.29%
Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2016, 12:32
Oblarg Oblarg is offline
Registered User
AKA: Eli Barnett
FRC #0449 (The Blair Robot Project)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,111
Oblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond reputeOblarg has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Scouting: Quantitative vs. Qualitative Poll

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boltman View Post
..and from a statistical perspective not enough sample size either.
This is a big part of what constitutes "garbage in," yes.

Along these lines, there are some very interesting cognitive science results that suggest that people make better judgments with extremely limited data sets when they rely on heuristics and intuition rather than explicit utility calculations. This is unsurprising, as the act of formalizing one's reasoning in that way often greatly restricts the body of evidence that you're actually using (since you only end up taking into account those things which you explicitly quantify), even if you're not aware of it. While in situations where you have large amounts of data this drawback is hugely outweighed by the benefits, when you're stuck with little information to begin with it can (and does) do more harm than good.
__________________
"Mmmmm, chain grease and aluminum shavings..."
"The breakfast of champions!"

Member, FRC Team 449: 2007-2010
Drive Mechanics Lead, FRC Team 449: 2009-2010
Alumnus/Technical Mentor, FRC Team 449: 2010-Present
Lead Technical Mentor, FRC Team 4464: 2012-2015
Technical Mentor, FRC Team 5830: 2015-2016

Last edited by Oblarg : 10-03-2016 at 12:38.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2016, 12:43
saikiranra's Avatar
saikiranra saikiranra is offline
UCI
AKA: Saikiran Ramanan
FRC #3476 (Code Orange)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 200
saikiranra has a reputation beyond reputesaikiranra has a reputation beyond reputesaikiranra has a reputation beyond reputesaikiranra has a reputation beyond reputesaikiranra has a reputation beyond reputesaikiranra has a reputation beyond reputesaikiranra has a reputation beyond reputesaikiranra has a reputation beyond reputesaikiranra has a reputation beyond reputesaikiranra has a reputation beyond reputesaikiranra has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Scouting: Quantitative vs. Qualitative Poll

If you know what sort of robots you are looking out for, quantitative data is very useful. Like most topics, however, a mix of the two will probably lead to the best results.
__________________
2014 - Current: Team 3476 Electronics, Programming, and Scouting Mentor
2011 - 2014: Team 696 Student and Drive Coach
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi