Go to Post Please stand up and be proud of who you are and what you believe in! - MattK [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2016, 12:51
BotDesigner's Avatar
BotDesigner BotDesigner is offline
Design/CAD/Strategy/TeamManagement
AKA: David Gedney
FRC #4418 (Team Impulse)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 110
BotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud ofBotDesigner has much to be proud of
wedge as part of bumpers

Would mounting a wedge underneath the bumpers as a hard bumper part be legal? We found our robot couldn't cross the rock wall with the new dimensions late in the build season, and we need some extra clearance on the front of the robot to make it over.
Quote:
R21
...
G.
must attach to the FRAME PERIMETER of the ROBOT with a rigid fastening system to form a tight, robust connection to the main structure/frame (e.g. not attached with hook-and-loop, tape, or tie-wraps). The attachment system must be designed to withstand vigorous game play. All removable fasteners (e.g. bolts, locking pins, pip-pins, etc.) will be considered part of the BUMPERS.
So, if the wedge doubled as a bumper support this would appear to be legal. Of course the wedge would have to be in the bumper zone and extend no more than 1in from the frame perimeter.
The picture is here:http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/43107
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2016, 12:56
Jon Stratis's Avatar
Jon Stratis Jon Stratis is offline
Electrical/Programming Mentor
FRC #2177 (The Robettes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,753
Jon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: wedge as part of bumpers

The only place to get a usable answer is the official Q&A. Personally, I think this pushes things a little too far. That ramp part doesn't really seem to serve any purposes for attaching the bumper to the robot, it's just there to help with game play - that is not the intent of the bumpers or the bumper rules.
__________________
2007 - Present: Mentor, 2177 The Robettes
LRI: North Star 2012-2016; Lake Superior 2013-2014; MN State Tournament 2013-2014, 2016; Galileo 2016; Iowa 2017
2015: North Star Regional Volunteer of the Year
2016: Lake Superior WFFA
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2016, 12:58
alicen's Avatar
alicen alicen is offline
Zebra Committee
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: The South
Posts: 224
alicen is just really nicealicen is just really nicealicen is just really nicealicen is just really nicealicen is just really nice
Re: wedge as part of bumpers

Future reference, you could have combined this thread with your other one

Based on what I saw with your picture, I don't believe this would be legal.

The wedge you describe as a bumper support isn't actually supporting your bumper at all, and is not legal with the very clear way that FIRST has called for bumpers to be designed.

The "wedge" as you have it is also becoming your new frame perimeter, so that makes the placement of your bumpers illegal.
__________________
Peachtree Regional Volunteer since 2003
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2016, 13:37
jvriezen jvriezen is offline
Registered User
FRC #3184 (Burnsville Blaze)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Burnsville, MN
Posts: 636
jvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond repute
Re: wedge as part of bumpers

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis View Post
The only place to get a usable answer is the official Q&A. Personally, I think this pushes things a little too far. That ramp part doesn't really seem to serve any purposes for attaching the bumper to the robot, it's just there to help with game play - that is not the intent of the bumpers or the bumper rules.
I'm just a lowly RI, and Jon is my state's head LRI, but I'd interpret the rules differently-- in your favor. The wedge (assuming it resides above 4") can also be viewed as strengthening the bumper mount assembly, since it helps prevents bending of that piece and the attached bumper.

We are allowed to choose bumper fabric to assist in game play (slippery to avoid defense, friction to help play defense) and bumper height, horizontal bumper coverage to allow support or clearance for manipulators etc. Why can't I design a bumper mount system that also optimizes game play?

In 2012, we specifically used 1/8th steel sheet bumper mounts that ran the length of the bumper backing board and sized the height of the steel specifically to approach the 20lb max bumper weight (to help lower CG) it was very much overkill for a robust mounting system-- however they also strengthened the overall bot frame (which was made of birch plywood). Any bumper that has extra fasteners to the frame will help make the frame/bumper system more robust, as does this one.

As Jon says, use Q & A, but I suspect you'll get a non-answer, and they will defer to your inspector/LRI.

Hence, you may want to consider a 'safer' solution that is not so open to interpretation.

P.S. It's refreshing to see a Bumper post that doesn't have "8 inches" in it somewhere.
__________________
John Vriezen
FRC, Mentor, Inspector #3184 2016- #4859 2015, #2530 2010-2014 FTC Mentor, Inspector #7152 2013-14
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2016, 13:38
Jon Stratis's Avatar
Jon Stratis Jon Stratis is offline
Electrical/Programming Mentor
FRC #2177 (The Robettes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,753
Jon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: wedge as part of bumpers

Quote:
Originally Posted by alicen View Post
The "wedge" as you have it is also becoming your new frame perimeter, so that makes the placement of your bumpers illegal.
that depends what the wedge is attached to - if it is a permanent part of the ROBOT, then yes. If it's . Part of the bumper, then no. This is the same way that brackets or the optional aluminum angle on top/bottom of the bumper (as illustrated in figure 4-7) does not count towards your frame perimeter.

This really is just a question as to what constitutes a legal fastening system, and are features that do not impact how "rigidly attached" the bumper is legal?
__________________
2007 - Present: Mentor, 2177 The Robettes
LRI: North Star 2012-2016; Lake Superior 2013-2014; MN State Tournament 2013-2014, 2016; Galileo 2016; Iowa 2017
2015: North Star Regional Volunteer of the Year
2016: Lake Superior WFFA
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2016, 13:52
engunneer's Avatar
engunneer engunneer is offline
Alumni turned Mentor
AKA: Branden Gunn
FRC #4761
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Reading, MA
Posts: 847
engunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond reputeengunneer has a reputation beyond repute
Re: wedge as part of bumpers

R21A also has something to add to this. I think if your hard parts were 5.5" tall and had a chamfer at the bottom edge, and you managed to get your fabric attached to it, it could potentially be legal. As drawn, not so much.
__________________
Student FRC23 (1996-1999), Mentor FRC246 (2000), Mentor FRC1318 (2007-2009), Mentor FRC93 (2011), Mentor FRC2151 (2012), Mentor FRC23 (2013), Mentor FRC4761 (2014-2017)
1998 - National Chairman's Award and Woodie Flowers Award (FRC23, Mike Bastoni ) | 2007 - PNW SF (488, 1595) | 2008 - Oregon RCA - Seattle #2 Seed, SF (488, 1696) | 2009 - Oregon #1 Seed, Winners (1983, 2635) - Seattle SF (945, 2865) - Galileo #2 Seed, SF (973, 25) | 2012 Midwest F (111, 71) | 2014 RIDE Winners (78, 125), Inspector - NEU #24, QF (3479, 3958) - NECMP #35 | 2015 Reading #11, SF (1058, 190), Inspector - RIDE #17, QF(4055, 5494), Inspector - NECMP #57 | 2016 Reading #4, SF (133, 4474), DCA, Inspector - Ride #22, SF (1735, 2067), Creativity, Inspector - NECMP #48, RCA - Archimedes
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2016, 14:00
rich2202 rich2202 is offline
Registered User
FRC #2202 (BEAST Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,192
rich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond reputerich2202 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: wedge as part of bumpers

Short answer is: No.

Long answer: If it is part of the Bumper: No. The Bumper is the Bumper and must follow the Bumper rules. A wedge is not a valid Bumper design.

If it is within your frame perimeter and attached to the Robot, then it is ok.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2016, 14:10
Eric Scheuing's Avatar
Eric Scheuing Eric Scheuing is offline
Registered User
FRC #0999 (MechaRAMS)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Cheshire, CT
Posts: 405
Eric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud of
Re: wedge as part of bumpers

At Waterbury, we discovered our bumpers had a 1/4" gap between the front of the bot and the frame. We called the lead inspector over to discuss legality, and he said that we would need to put a piece of material in there for it to be considered fully supported. What's more, he said that if it mounted to our bumper, it would not count against our frame perimeter.

Long story short, do what everyone else is saying and mount it to your bumper. It shouldn't count against your frame perimeter.

Ninja Edit: Make sure it's easily removable in case the inspector has an issue with it though.
__________________




2005-2007: Bobcat Robotics 177
2015-20XX: MechaRAMS 999
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-03-2016, 14:23
Ryan_Todd's Avatar
Ryan_Todd Ryan_Todd is offline
ye of little faith
FRC #0862 (Lightning Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 114
Ryan_Todd has a reputation beyond reputeRyan_Todd has a reputation beyond reputeRyan_Todd has a reputation beyond reputeRyan_Todd has a reputation beyond reputeRyan_Todd has a reputation beyond reputeRyan_Todd has a reputation beyond reputeRyan_Todd has a reputation beyond reputeRyan_Todd has a reputation beyond reputeRyan_Todd has a reputation beyond reputeRyan_Todd has a reputation beyond reputeRyan_Todd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: wedge as part of bumpers

Quote:
Originally Posted by jvriezen View Post
...The wedge (assuming it resides above 4") can also be viewed as strengthening the bumper mount assembly, since it helps prevents bending of that piece and the attached bumper.
[snip...]
As Jon says, use Q & A, but I suspect you'll get a non-answer, and they will defer to your inspector/LRI.

Hence, you may want to consider a 'safer' solution that is not so open to interpretation...
Agreed on all counts!

In particular, that gap between the top of the wedge and the bottom of the wood is the biggest reason why one would question the legality of this design. All you need is to slide the remainder of the bumper assembly down until it bumps into the top of the wedge, and the wedge becomes an indisputably integral (if somewhat unconventional) reinforcing member of the bumper assembly.

in other words:
________
|| . . .\
|| . . . |
|| . . . |
|| . . . |
|| . . . |
|| . . . |
||______/
|
| <---- questionable gap

|__
| /
|/


becomes

________
|| . . .\
|| . . . |
|| . . . |
|| . . . |
|| . . . |
|| . . . |
||______/
| / <---- definitely part of the bumper
|/
__________________

Last edited by Ryan_Todd : 10-03-2016 at 14:26. Reason: tweak ASCII art
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi