|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Are 8 play regional reasonable?
Quote:
1: MSHSL State Championship gets blended into the FIRST State Championship Obviously, this only works if we don't take any other states along with us to districts. I also have no idea how amenable MSHSL would be to this, but it doesn't seem particularly complicated if nobody's feelings are going to get hurt. 2: MSHSL continues as is, but now they can count two events per team Also a pretty simple way forward, there's just a 'small' naming issue with having two State Tournaments. This also doesn't seem particularly complicated to me. The perhaps minor change to this versus the FIRST model is that the MSHSL model would likely simply be the first two events anywhere that a team attends, as opposed to the first two events in district (which, as I understand it, is how district events are). In the second case there's a question of whether to assess point rankings based on how MN calculates them or how FIRST calculates them. Obviously the first method is easier than the second, but there are some good fairness reasons that MN currently calculates based on the first event. That strikes me more as a discussion that needs to happen versus a major complication. There may be other alternatives, but those are the two that come to mind. Wow, I hope I can worry about this more soon. If you look back further, you'll see that last year was the first time Minnesota wheels touched the Einstein carpet. Last edited by cadandcookies : 12-03-2016 at 23:24. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|