|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Galileo Division: What is your team position on collusion? | |||
| We support it, we plan to do it |
|
3 | 6.12% |
| We support it, but do not plan to do it |
|
0 | 0% |
| We do not support it, and do not plan to do it |
|
45 | 91.84% |
| We do not support it, but might do it anyway |
|
1 | 2.04% |
| Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here we go again... There was no obvious point colluding at the SVR. It made the competition more interesting and reflect what actually happened on the field, not how persuasive a team could be to fix a match before hand.
We will be in Houston to compete, not to collude in this years game... Stack Attack As far as collusion goes, JUST SAY NO Last edited by pbarrett03 : 04-04-2003 at 01:40. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Galileo teams | Andy Baker | Championship Event | 34 | 06-04-2003 20:52 |
| Hits, Misses, & Suggestions -- long message | archiver | 2000 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |
| The Case For 'Regionalizing' teams at the Nationals. | archiver | 2000 | 33 | 23-06-2002 23:35 |
| How do we view more teams? | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 23:11 |
| Multiple Regionals | archiver | 1999 | 55 | 23-06-2002 22:26 |