|
|
|
 This, right here, is why I participate in FRC. Changing lives, one corndog at a time. - Jared Russell [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| This, right here, is why I participate in FRC. Changing lives, one corndog at a time. - Jared Russell [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question About 2014 Shooting
Our vision in 2014 was there only to see if the high goal had a bonus or not. If it did, it shot. If not, it waited.
This year its our main way of seeing the field, has multiple crosshairs for aiming, and (as we get it down) auto-aim and shoot accurately on field during auto. (while solid in practice,its been very spotty during actual play.) |
|
#2
27-03-2016, 00:59
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Question About 2014 Shooting
Lots of driver practice.
 He had a 3 foot range he had to shoot from. For the corner goal shot, he needed to be flat on the ground and touching the goal. As the season evolved and the cost of a missed shot climbed, we ended up switching to the higher accuracy shot. If we were to do it again, I'd look at figuring out distance to increase the reliability of the medium distance shot. |
|
#3
27-03-2016, 13:25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Question About 2014 Shooting
The big difference between this year and 2014 is the lack of visibility. In 2014, an open field meant teams could see where they needed to be to make a shot, usually determined by a lot of practice. A lot of teams went with the very scientific method of 'that looks right'.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
